On Mon Oct 11 13:40, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > 5. Recommendation
> > -
> > I recommend to accept Niels Thykier as a Debian Developer.
>
> Oh yeah! I've interacted with him alot for various tricky stuff
> (esp. in java packages, no surprise), and he just rocks. Please
> make him
On Fri Jun 11 23:07, Thomas Koch wrote:
> I'm applying to becoma a Debian Maintainer.
I support Thomas' application to become a Debian Maintainer.
I have sponsored several of his packages working with the Java team and they
have been good quality. I'm confident of his ability to update them witho
ers [1].
I have reviewed a number of Niel's packages within the Java team both for
updates and new packages and have found his work to be of high quality and
consider him competent enough to become a Debian Maintainer. Therefore, I
support his application.
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
si
"an honourific", "a
user" etc. NMU is pronounced "en-em-ewe", so it should be "an NMU".
(just try saying "a NMU" out loud, the glottal stop is horrible)
Matt
0. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_and_an
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ttp://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2009/03/msg00053.html
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
x bugs
> even on architectures other than their own.
Yup, this is what I'd like to see as well.
So far I don't think I've seen anyone objecting to the overall approach
though, which is good. I think it allows us to start discussing more
specific implementation details.
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Shall we say decoupling it from specific technical
abilities such as upload rights and package maintenance?
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
many things here I agree with, I don't think we can tackle
them all at once here. I'm just trying to work on one thing.
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
is a waste: their skills and passion are better employed
> in continuing their good work on Debian.
Oh, absolutely, I really want to streamline it where possible. I've been
saying this since I was in NM (-:
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
2. http://wiki.debian.org/Projects/AltReformedMembershipProcess
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ly saying anything about this case) if people
have doubts about someone in DM it means that we would rather they went
through the more formal and thorough checking that NM involves. Detailed
investigation into their current work is what their AM is for.
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue Jan 29 13:16, Lex Spoon wrote:
> On Jan 29, 2008, at 4:24 AM, Matthew Johnson wrote:
>> I strongly agree with Christoph. As it is I am of the opinion that it is
>> too easy to get DM rights (particularly given the number of people who
>> said 'it ought to take 3
l uploads, when a little more time would
mean you didn't make the upload at all.
I hardly think a week is a long time to wait.
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
x27;t think anyone disagrees
that the account creation wait should be shorter; by making access
control more fine grained it makes it easier to delegate at least some
of the decisions and tasks for those access permissions which aren't as
wide ranging. This may assuage the concerns some hav
; gives me a weird feeling. What
> I like on Debian is that all DDs are equal, they have the same rights,
> they can do the same things, and they're supposed to know at least the
> same basic parts. That's something which should not be changed without a
> good reason.
That's why I prefer to be granting things based on what permissions you
need and what technical ability you need to do them. With project member
being orthogonal.
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tp://mjj29.matthew.ath.cx/nm_log.txt
4. http://wiki.debian.org/Projects/AltReformedMembershipProcess
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
16 matches
Mail list logo
