On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 07:00:41PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > Let's be clear, the only rejected UID I recall
> > recently was someone applying for DM status who had added an @debian.org
> > email address to their key which they had no entitlement to. > keyring-maint hat>
>
> There also was
On 05.02.2018 00:48, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> ยน as the process will then have to be restart if wanted, and previous
> advocacies will have to either be re-made (i.e. bother the advocate
> again) or some nm.d.o admin will need to carry it over to the new
> process (not going to happen), or an FD
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 04:09:11PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 12:48:06AM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > "unacceptable uid, rejected by keyring-maint".
>
> Let's be clear, the only rejected UID I recall
> recently was someone applying for DM status who had added an
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 12:48:06AM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Currently we have 6 DM processes that have been stalled for many months
> (the oldest started last May, i.e. 9 months ago) because of issues with
> the applicant GPG key.
> Issues range from "no signatures at all" through "no dd
4 matches
Mail list logo
