Re: splitting up the ocaml package: summary

2004-07-02 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 02:32:12PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote: Erg, I finally got around to putting all of my patches into svn for this. Find them in ocaml/tags/3.07.2a-x11-split Erm, this is not a tag, but a branch, at least for now, so i moved it to branches/x11-split. Building now before i

Re: splitting up the ocaml package: summary

2004-07-02 Thread Mike Furr
On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 06:47, Sven Luther wrote: Erm, this is not a tag, but a branch, at least for now, so i moved it to branches/x11-split. Oops, sorry. I don't quite grok svn(and the difference between branch and tag). That said, depending on the release schedule, we may be able to move to

Re: splitting up the ocaml package: summary

2004-07-02 Thread =?iso-8859-1?b?Suly9G1l?= Marant
Quoting Mike Furr [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 06:47, Sven Luther wrote: Erm, this is not a tag, but a branch, at least for now, so i moved it to branches/x11-split. Oops, sorry. I don't quite grok svn(and the difference between branch and tag). You do. There is no difference

Re: splitting up the ocaml package: summary

2004-07-02 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 03:30:49PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: Quoting Mike Furr [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 06:47, Sven Luther wrote: Erm, this is not a tag, but a branch, at least for now, so i moved it to branches/x11-split. Oops, sorry. I don't quite grok svn(and the

Re: splitting up the ocaml package: summary

2004-07-02 Thread Michael Furr
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Sven Luther wrote: Now, what is the best practice to bring this tihng again in the main trunk ? Move the trunk out of the way, and svn mv the branch to the trunk ? Mike, you did a svn cp when you first created it, right ? Yes, I just followed the example of the svn book.

Re: splitting up the ocaml package: summary

2004-07-02 Thread Sylvain LE GALL
Hello, On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 05:57:28PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 10:36:53AM -0400, Michael Furr wrote: On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, [iso-8859-1] Jérôme Marant wrote: BTW Mike, it seems you didn't update debian/copyright about compiler-libs, did you ? I added

Re: splitting up the ocaml package: summary

2004-07-02 Thread Jérôme Marant
Michael Furr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, [iso-8859-1] Jérôme Marant wrote: BTW Mike, it seems you didn't update debian/copyright about compiler-libs, did you ? I added debian/ocaml-compiler-libs.copyright and o-c-l.README.Debian which each have a note in them. I didn't

Re: splitting up the ocaml package: summary

2004-07-02 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 09:37:36PM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote: Hello, On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 05:57:28PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 10:36:53AM -0400, Michael Furr wrote: On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, [iso-8859-1] Jérôme Marant wrote: BTW Mike, it seems you didn't update

Re: splitting up the ocaml package: summary

2004-07-02 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 12:47:34PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: That said, depending on the release schedule, we may be able to move to 3.08 for sarge, not sure though, i will see if i can prepare 3.08 experimental packages for now. While we are at it I think it's wise to prepare them in the

Re: splitting up the ocaml package: summary

2004-07-02 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 02:33:31AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 12:47:34PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: That said, depending on the release schedule, we may be able to move to 3.08 for sarge, not sure though, i will see if i can prepare 3.08 experimental packages