Processed: tagging 339061

2008-02-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13 tags 339061 + fixed-upstream Bug#339061: ocamlopt emits buggy IA64 programs There were no tags set. Bug#347270: camomile: FTBS on arm and ia64 Tags added: fixed-upstream End of

Bug#418634: marked as done (ocamlcp can break polymorphism (causing type error))

2008-02-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:03:03 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Re: Bug#418634: ocamlcp can break polymorphism (causing type error) has caused the Debian Bug report #418634, regarding ocamlcp can break polymorphism (causing type error) to be marked as done.

Bug#339061: unmerging 339061, retitle 347270 to ocamlopt produces buggy arm programs, tagging 339061

2008-02-20 Thread Julien Cristau
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16 # let's unmerge these two unrelated bugs unmerge 339061 retitle 347270 ocamlopt produces buggy arm programs tags 339061 - fixed-upstream -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Processed: unmerging 339061, retitle 347270 to ocamlopt produces buggy arm programs, tagging 339061

2008-02-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16 # let's unmerge these two unrelated bugs unmerge 339061 Bug#339061: ocamlopt emits buggy IA64 programs Bug#347270: camomile: FTBS on arm and ia64 Disconnected #339061 from all other

Re: binNMUs for the OCaml transition

2008-02-20 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Julien Cristau a écrit : Note that all architectures are not listed for each package: I took archs where at least one binary package exists (or all if one arch-independant binary package exists). arch-independant packages are not rebuilt by binary NMUs, so you should ignore those

Re: binNMUs for the OCaml transition

2008-02-20 Thread Ralf Treinen
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 09:29:31PM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote: Julien Cristau a écrit : Note that all architectures are not listed for each package: I took archs where at least one binary package exists (or all if one arch-independant binary package exists). arch-independant