Re: Block new modules ?

On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 04:14:54AM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote: I'm currently adding new modules in unstable that are not yet in testing.. Wouldn't it be a good idea to block them from moving to testing, at least until we know if we intent to do the new transition for lenny ? Uh? I don't

Re: Block new modules ?

On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 08:44:22AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 04:14:54AM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote: I'm currently adding new modules in unstable that are not yet in testing.. Wouldn't it be a good idea to block them from moving to testing, at least until

Bug#138157: Quite simply put : unbelievable

Be the Alpha Male of your community, gain 3-6 inches within a few months http://www.Hardrockhard.com/ Earn her trust and body -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Block new modules ?

Le Monday 24 March 2008 08:44:22 Stefano Zacchiroli, vous avez écrit : On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 04:14:54AM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote: I'm currently adding new modules in unstable that are not yet in testing.. Wouldn't it be a good idea to block them from moving to testing, at least

Bug#207471: Keep it tight and simple

Never have any more lonely nights with your new huge pecker http://www.Inchesgainers.com/ Intensify and double your pleasure -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#335578: Pink and wet

Be the pride of your family with your legendary pecker http://www.dhipinktw.com/ Lindsay giving head -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#472501: doc-base: Please add the Programming/OCaml section

Package: doc-base Version: 0.8.10 Severity: wishlist Hi, It would be nice if you could allow the Programming/OCaml section. There are many OCaml libraries in Debian and having all their doc registered in the same section would be useful. Thanks! -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid

Re: Block new modules ?

On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 02:37:52PM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote: That's not what I meant. I meant that if they are not in testing, then they don't block the transition of ocaml itself to testing.. Yes, that's clear. But frankly, for my packages, I don't like to block them to enter testing just

Re: Block new modules ?

On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:27:01AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: BTW, just curious, but why don't we upload 3.10.2 to unstable, and upload any further 3.10.1 stuff through lenny-proposed-upgrades or something such ? IMO because both of those actions add work on top of the release manager and, at

Re: doc-base: creating subsections under Programming?

Ralf Treinen wrote: In case of OCaml there is a team maintaining/coordinating the packages associated to this language, so we could make this move in a coordinated way. Furthermore we are thinking of going for a transition to a new version of ocaml in a few days, which would mean uploads (or

Processing of ocsigen_1.0.0~rc2-1_i386.changes

ocsigen_1.0.0~rc2-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ocsigen_1.0.0~rc2-1.dsc ocsigen_1.0.0~rc2.orig.tar.gz ocsigen_1.0.0~rc2-1.diff.gz ocsigen-doc_1.0.0~rc2-1_all.deb ocsigen_1.0.0~rc2-1_i386.deb liblwt-ocaml-dev_1.0.0~rc2-1_i386.deb

ocsigen_1.0.0~rc2-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: liblwt-ocaml-dev_1.0.0~rc2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ocsigen/liblwt-ocaml-dev_1.0.0~rc2-1_i386.deb ocsigen-dev_1.0.0~rc2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/o/ocsigen/ocsigen-dev_1.0.0~rc2-1_i386.deb ocsigen-doc_1.0.0~rc2-1_all.deb to pool/main/o/ocsigen/ocsigen-doc_1.0.0~rc2-1_all.deb