Bug#472923: camlp5: does not compile with ocaml 3.10.2

2008-03-27 Thread Ralf Treinen
Package: camlp5 Version: 5-5.07 Severity: normal Compilation with ocaml-3.10.2 (from experimental): ./configure -name camlp5 -mandir /usr/share/man Sorry: the compatibility with ocaml version 3.10.2 is not yet implemented. Please report. Configuration failed. make: ***

Bug#472923: marked as forwarded (camlp5: does not compile with ocaml 3.10.2)

2008-03-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:59:19 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] has caused the report #472923, regarding camlp5: does not compile with ocaml 3.10.2 to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) Daniel de Rauglaudre [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NB: If you

Bug#472994: lablgtk2: FTBFS on OCaml 3.10.2

2008-03-27 Thread Stephane Glondu
Package: lablgtk2 Severity: important Justification: fails to build from source The package lablgtk2 fails to build from source with ocaml 3.10.2. Attached is a patch which fixes the problem. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'),

Bug#472994: lablgtk2: FTBFS on OCaml 3.10.2

2008-03-27 Thread Samuel Mimram
Stephane Glondu wrote: The package lablgtk2 fails to build from source with ocaml 3.10.2. Attached is a patch which fixes the problem. I think we'd better switch to new upstream release 2.10.1 if we go for a full rebuild for OCaml 3.10.2 since it also fixes other minor bugs. Cheers, Samuel.

Bug#472994: lablgtk2: FTBFS on OCaml 3.10.2

2008-03-27 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 06:03:19PM +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote: The package lablgtk2 fails to build from source with ocaml 3.10.2. Attached is a patch which fixes the problem. I think we'd better switch to new upstream release 2.10.1 if we go for a full rebuild for OCaml 3.10.2 since it also

Re: .cmx inclusion in modules

2008-03-27 Thread Romain Beauxis
Le Wednesday 26 March 2008 08:55:45 Stefano Zacchiroli, vous avez écrit : We could even think about mass bug submission about this don't you think ? Good practice in this case is to have data first First step: A quick and dirty script looked for package which ships a .cmxa file without

Re: .cmx inclusion in modules

2008-03-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 02:26:51 +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote: A quick and dirty script looked for package which ships a .cmxa file without corresponding .cmx. Seems buggy. Now, the question is: is it relevant for all of them ? Here's the list ($PACKAGE: $MISSING_CMX): ocaml-nox:

Re: .cmx inclusion in modules

2008-03-27 Thread Romain Beauxis
Le Friday 28 March 2008 02:36:12 Julien Cristau, vous avez écrit : ocaml-nox: usr/lib/ocaml/3.10.1/bigarray.cmx This one is actually shipped in ocaml-nox.  I didn't look further, so there are probably others. Right, sorry, wrong regexp.. Here's the updated list, which I believe is valid

Re: .cmx inclusion in modules

2008-03-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 02:52:15 +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote: Le Friday 28 March 2008 02:36:12 Julien Cristau, vous avez écrit : ocaml-nox: usr/lib/ocaml/3.10.1/bigarray.cmx This one is actually shipped in ocaml-nox.  I didn't look further, so there are probably others. Right, sorry,

Re: .cmx inclusion in modules

2008-03-27 Thread Romain Beauxis
Le Friday 28 March 2008 03:09:57 Julien Cristau, vous avez écrit : Here's the updated list, which I believe is valid this time (mean: I couldn't find false positives..) That one looks a lot better :) Fine ! But not there yet: your script seems to assume that the name of the library