A MAIOR E MELHOR REDE PRIVADA DE WEBSITES DE VÍDEOS E IMAGENS EM PORTUGUÊS
WWW.VIDEO-DIVERTIDO.COM - O Maior Portal Português De Vídeos De Humor.
WWW.ACELERAS.NET - O Portal Em Português Para Todos Os Amantes Do Mundo
Automóvel.
WWW.VIDEOS-FUTEBOL.COM - Videos-Futebol.com: os melhores
George Danchev a écrit :
1. apply the above mentioned patch against ocamldep as brought with ocaml-nox
package. That would be pretty dangerous, since ocaml-nox rdeps are exposed at
risk. Unlikely to be approved by the release team.
It seems the patch has already been applied upstream, since
On 07-01-2009, Stéphane Glondu st...@glondu.net wrote:
4. completely remove that broken package from the archive, no build-repends
are found, no harm done. This is my favourity one.
Has someone any news from Mike Furr? The last mail from him on a Debian
mailing-list dates back to Feb. 2008
Sylvain Le Gall gil...@debian.org writes:
On 07-01-2009, Stéphane Glondu st...@glondu.net wrote:
4. completely remove that broken package from the archive, no build-repends
are found, no harm done. This is my favourity one.
Has someone any news from Mike Furr? The last mail from him on a
Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org writes:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:18:25PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I'm writing ocaml bindings for libaio and am wondering if anyone is
interested in looking them over and eventually sponsoring them. The
I'll be happy to sponsor the upload.
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 07:22:50PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Can't something be worked out so there is only one place? Given the
size of this it seems way to much overhead to split it.
Yes, it can, but my suggestion to split was based on the fact that
both places are not suitable per
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:35:33PM +, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
For what is important, I totally agree with hijacking the package to
git/d-o-m. I think Mike Furr is MIA for now, just explain that we hijack
the package waiting mfurr to come back.
While stating that, it would have been more
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:54:52PM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
I intend to have a deeper look at omake by the end of the
week... with at least a migration to git, and switch of Maintainer
to d-o-m (unless otherwise instructed).
Seconded.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \
Hi d-o-m,
Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Has someone any news from Mike Furr? The last mail from him on a
Debian mailing-list dates back to Feb. 2008 with a signature
suggesting that he was lacking time for Debian². Note that the
Maintainer field of omake is set to Mike Furr, and not the
I wrote in 4964c23c.7020...@glondu.net:
1. apply the above mentioned patch against ocamldep as brought with
ocaml-nox
package. That would be pretty dangerous, since ocaml-nox rdeps are exposed
at
risk. Unlikely to be approved by the release team.
It seems the patch has already been
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:29:49 +0100 Stéphane Glondu wrote:
As said in git commit bfd1cebf64a424759df083c1fc15276cc9ea3fff:
Do not install ocamldep-omake (Closes: #510919)
The build system of omake detects by itself that standard ocamldep
supports -modules (starting from OCaml 3.10), and
Mike Furr wrote:
[things]
Obviously, I didn't see this mail when I wrote my previous one
(496548fd.2080...@glondu.net).
1) Remove ocamldep-omake from the package since it is not used by omake
itself. This may impact users who otherwise invoke it themselves (for
historical reasons).
This is
Evgeni Golov a écrit :
Did you also remove the binary from the .orig.tar.gz? We don't have the
source for it...
No, I didn't. Even though the source is not technically available (in
the archive, today), there is an advertised way to rebuild it with only
free tools... IMHO, it is not the same
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:05:02 +0100 Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Evgeni Golov a écrit :
Did you also remove the binary from the .orig.tar.gz? We don't have the
source for it...
No, I didn't. Even though the source is not technically available (in
the archive, today), there is an advertised way
14 matches
Mail list logo
