On 17-12-2007, Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 10:10:19PM +, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
I have debugged this i think (in
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:18:15AM +, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
I was a little busy yesterday... I would like to be sure that there is
no other possible regression (i.e. in other packages regarding this PIC
problem).
No regression, the old library name for the ocaml interpreter shared
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 10:10:19PM +, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
Any taker?
I will upload on friday (after debugging the OCAMLDOC_PACKAGES stuff).
Many thanks in advance.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ... now what?
[EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%-
On 11-12-2007, Samuel Mimram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
Yes, this arch is schedule for removal. Looking at the last entry of the
ocaml package changelog:
* remove ia64, arm and alpha native arches (no more ocamlopt for this
arches)
When it will be time, somebody
* Sylvain Le Gall:
I think we should advertise a little bit about the fact that 3 arches
will be dropped -- and then upload!
Please word the announcement more carefully. These architectures aren't
dropped AFAICT. Only the buggy native code compiler is removed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 01:49:55AM +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote:
When it will be time, somebody should consider uploading the ocaml
package sitting in the SVN (which include this kind of changes).
What prevents us from doing it right now since ocaml 3.10 is in testing
and we don't have a
On 11-12-2007, Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--JYK4vJDZwFMowpUq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 01:49:55AM +0100, Samuel Mimram wrote:
When it will be time, somebody
I heard that there was intention to drop native compilers on many
architecture like ia64 cause it is buggy... I don't remember if alpha
was one scheduled for removal. If it is not schedule for removal, please
take a look at this log
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 15:02:13 +0100, Enrico Tassi wrote:
I heard that there was intention to drop native compilers on many
architecture like ia64 cause it is buggy... I don't remember if alpha
was one scheduled for removal. If it is not schedule for removal, please
take a look at this log
Hello,
On 10-12-2007, Enrico Tassi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I heard that there was intention to drop native compilers on many
architecture like ia64 cause it is buggy... I don't remember if alpha
was one scheduled for removal. If it is not schedule for removal, please
take a look at this log
Hi,
Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
Yes, this arch is schedule for removal. Looking at the last entry of the
ocaml package changelog:
* remove ia64, arm and alpha native arches (no more ocamlopt for this
arches)
When it will be time, somebody should consider uploading the ocaml
package sitting in
11 matches
Mail list logo
