-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:03:36 +0100
Source: advi
Binary: advi
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.4.0-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sylvain LE GALL [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:37:04 +0100
Source: lablgtk
Binary: liblablgtk-ocaml liblablgtk-ocaml-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.6-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sven
advi_1.4.0-7_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
advi_1.4.0-7.dsc
advi_1.4.0-7.diff.gz
advi_1.4.0-7_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Accepted:
advi_1.4.0-7.diff.gz
to pool/main/a/advi/advi_1.4.0-7.diff.gz
advi_1.4.0-7.dsc
to pool/main/a/advi/advi_1.4.0-7.dsc
advi_1.4.0-7_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/advi/advi_1.4.0-7_i386.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 227267
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jan 2004 03:47:13 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#227267: fixed in advi 1.4.0-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:17:24 +0100
Source: lablgtk2
Binary: liblablgtk2-ocaml liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2.0+20040113-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I was thinking something about the way we handle subversion stuff.
Would it make sense to have in each trunk directory also a simple
Makefile which would contain some simple targets to ease the build and
upload of the packages ?
I was thinking of the following stuff :
- build : calls
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 12:57:34PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
I was thinking something about the way we handle subversion stuff.
Would it make sense to have in each trunk directory also a simple
Makefile which would contain some simple targets to ease the build and
upload of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 15:03:36 +0100
Source: advi
Binary: advi
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.4.0-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Sylvain LE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 20:22:26 +0100
Source: ulex
Binary: ocaml-ulex
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:37:04 +0100
Source: lablgtk
Binary: liblablgtk-ocaml liblablgtk-ocaml-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.6-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Sven
advi_1.4.0-7_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
advi_1.4.0-7.dsc
advi_1.4.0-7.diff.gz
advi_1.4.0-7_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jan 2004 03:47:13 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#227267: fixed in advi 1.4.0-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:17:24 +0100
Source: lablgtk2
Binary: liblablgtk2-ocaml liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.2.0+20040113-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted:
advi_1.4.0-7.diff.gz
to pool/main/a/advi/advi_1.4.0-7.diff.gz
advi_1.4.0-7.dsc
to pool/main/a/advi/advi_1.4.0-7.dsc
advi_1.4.0-7_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/advi/advi_1.4.0-7_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 227267
Thank you for your
Hello,
I was thinking something about the way we handle subversion stuff.
Would it make sense to have in each trunk directory also a simple
Makefile which would contain some simple targets to ease the build and
upload of the packages ?
I was thinking of the following stuff :
- build : calls
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 12:57:34PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello,
I was thinking something about the way we handle subversion stuff.
Would it make sense to have in each trunk directory also a simple
Makefile which would contain some simple targets to ease the build and
upload of the
17 matches
Mail list logo