Bug#242841: ITP: mlgmp -- O'Caml bindings for the GNU multiprecision arithmetic library

2004-04-09 Thread Mike Furr
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Package name: mlgmp Version : 20021123 Upstream Author : David Monniaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL : http://www.di.ens.fr/~monniaux/index.html.en License : LGPL with exceptions to relax clause 6 Description : O'Caml

Bug#242842: ITP: ocamlcreal -- O'Caml library that implements exact real arithmetic

2004-04-09 Thread Mike Furr
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Package name: ocamlcreal Version : 0.4 Upstream Author : Jean-Christophe Filliâtre [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL : http://www.lri.fr/~filliatr/software.en.html License : LGPL Description : O'Caml library

Re: packagin some data structures

2004-04-09 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 12:59:21AM -0400, Mike Furr wrote: What do you guys think? Some possibilities include: (1) - Make lots of tiny packages (libheap-ocaml-dev,...) (2) - Make small groups (ocaml-tree-structures, ocaml-hash-structures,...) (3) - Make a larger

Re: Bug#242841: ITP: mlgmp -- O'Caml bindings for the GNU multiprecision arithmetic library

2004-04-09 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 01:54:48AM -0400, Mike Furr wrote: Package name: mlgmp Cool! (both this and ocamlcreal), could you please remember me to add these two packages to the PTS subscription for d-o-m _after_ they entered the debian archive? Thanks, Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*-

Re: Random segfaults on mipsel

2004-04-09 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 05:02:43PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: same command by hand works. I saw this at least with wlex and xstr. Since these packages are in the archive, I assume they used to build fine. Yes, they used to. I've no idea of what's going on, but is probably related to the

Re: Random segfaults on mipsel

2004-04-09 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-04-09 11:12]: If you have a reproducible example I can forward it to upstream, but I doubt he have a mipsel machine. Can you provide mipsel access also to non-DD? Yes. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: Random segfaults on mipsel

2004-04-09 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 10:42:18AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: doubt he have a mipsel machine. Can you provide mipsel access also to non-DD? Yes. Ok, anyway before asking upstream (since I know he is quite busy), may I ask if you've tried a full build cycle rebuilding ocaml - findlib -

Processing of coq_7.3.1-3_i386.changes

2004-04-09 Thread Archive Administrator
coq_7.3.1-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: coq_7.3.1-3.dsc coq_7.3.1-3.diff.gz coq_7.3.1-3_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

coq_7.3.1-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-04-09 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: coq_7.3.1-3.diff.gz to pool/main/c/coq/coq_7.3.1-3.diff.gz coq_7.3.1-3.dsc to pool/main/c/coq/coq_7.3.1-3.dsc coq_7.3.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/c/coq/coq_7.3.1-3_i386.deb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 242761 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To

Bug#242761: marked as done (coq: FTBFS: waits for input)

2004-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Apr 2004 13:17:03 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#242761: fixed in coq 7.3.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Re: ocamlgsl?

2004-04-09 Thread sylvain.le-gall
Hello, On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 01:08:47AM -0400, Mike Furr wrote: What's the story with the ocamlgsl package that's in svn? Sylvain, it looks like you started to package it a couple of months ago and it never made it into the archive... Are there any problems with the package? Do you just

Re: ocamlgsl?

2004-04-09 Thread Michael Furr
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Hummm... You think it doesn't look quite finished, could you give me more detail ? I will fix whatever you want to upload it ( i made a promise to upstream about this, in fact ). I noticed two things: you need a build dep on gawk and the lines:

Re: ocamlgsl?

2004-04-09 Thread sylvain.le-gall
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 02:15:28PM -0400, Michael Furr wrote: On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Hummm... You think it doesn't look quite finished, could you give me more detail ? I will fix whatever you want to upload it ( i made a promise to upstream about this, in fact ).

Bug#242968: OCamlMake: pabc broken

2004-04-09 Thread John Goerzen
Package: ocaml-tools Version: 2004.03.18-1 Severity: normal With the pabc target, the following command is attempted: ocamlc -passopt -pack -I configparser/ -I /usr/include/ocaml/3.07 -I /usr/include/ocaml/3.07-ccopt -Lconfigparser/ \ -o jglib.cmo

packagin some data structures

2004-04-09 Thread Mike Furr
Hi all, So, I was thinking about packaging some useful data structure implementations that I've found via the Hump. To start with, Jean-Christophe Filliâtre has a nice collection of them on his website[1] including things like heaps, tries, creal(exact real arith), hash-consing(neat idea!) and a

Re: packagin some data structures

2004-04-09 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 12:59:21AM -0400, Mike Furr wrote: Hi all, So, I was thinking about packaging some useful data structure implementations that I've found via the Hump. To start with, Jean-Christophe Filliâtre has a nice collection of them on his website[1] including things like

ocamlgsl?

2004-04-09 Thread Mike Furr
What's the story with the ocamlgsl package that's in svn? Sylvain, it looks like you started to package it a couple of months ago and it never made it into the archive... Are there any problems with the package? Do you just need a sponsor? It doesn't look quite finished, but fairly close. --

Re: packagin some data structures

2004-04-09 Thread Ralf Treinen
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 12:59:21AM -0400, Mike Furr wrote: Hi all, So, I was thinking about packaging some useful data structure implementations that I've found via the Hump. To start with, Jean-Christophe Filliâtre has a nice collection of them on his website[1] including things like

Bug#242842: ITP: ocamlcreal -- O'Caml library that implements exact real arithmetic

2004-04-09 Thread Mike Furr
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Package name: ocamlcreal Version : 0.4 Upstream Author : Jean-Christophe Filliâtre [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL : http://www.lri.fr/~filliatr/software.en.html License : LGPL Description : O'Caml library

Bug#242841: ITP: mlgmp -- O'Caml bindings for the GNU multiprecision arithmetic library

2004-04-09 Thread Mike Furr
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Package name: mlgmp Version : 20021123 Upstream Author : David Monniaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL : http://www.di.ens.fr/~monniaux/index.html.en License : LGPL with exceptions to relax clause 6 Description : O'Caml

Re: packagin some data structures

2004-04-09 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 12:59:21AM -0400, Mike Furr wrote: What do you guys think? Some possibilities include: (1) - Make lots of tiny packages (libheap-ocaml-dev,...) (2) - Make small groups (ocaml-tree-structures, ocaml-hash-structures,...) (3) - Make a larger

Re: Bug#242841: ITP: mlgmp -- O'Caml bindings for the GNU multiprecision arithmetic library

2004-04-09 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 01:54:48AM -0400, Mike Furr wrote: Package name: mlgmp Cool! (both this and ocamlcreal), could you please remember me to add these two packages to the PTS subscription for d-o-m _after_ they entered the debian archive? Thanks, Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*-

Re: Random segfaults on mipsel

2004-04-09 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 05:02:43PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: same command by hand works. I saw this at least with wlex and xstr. Since these packages are in the archive, I assume they used to build fine. Yes, they used to. I've no idea of what's going on, but is probably related to the

Re: Random segfaults on mipsel

2004-04-09 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-04-09 11:12]: If you have a reproducible example I can forward it to upstream, but I doubt he have a mipsel machine. Can you provide mipsel access also to non-DD? Yes. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Random segfaults on mipsel

2004-04-09 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 10:42:18AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: doubt he have a mipsel machine. Can you provide mipsel access also to non-DD? Yes. Ok, anyway before asking upstream (since I know he is quite busy), may I ask if you've tried a full build cycle rebuilding ocaml - findlib -

Processing of coq_7.3.1-3_i386.changes

2004-04-09 Thread Archive Administrator
coq_7.3.1-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: coq_7.3.1-3.dsc coq_7.3.1-3.diff.gz coq_7.3.1-3_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

coq_7.3.1-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2004-04-09 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: coq_7.3.1-3.diff.gz to pool/main/c/coq/coq_7.3.1-3.diff.gz coq_7.3.1-3.dsc to pool/main/c/coq/coq_7.3.1-3.dsc coq_7.3.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/c/coq/coq_7.3.1-3_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 242761 Thank you for your contribution to

Bug#242761: marked as done (coq: FTBFS: waits for input)

2004-04-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Apr 2004 13:17:03 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#242761: fixed in coq 7.3.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Re: ocamlgsl?

2004-04-09 Thread sylvain.le-gall
Hello, On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 01:08:47AM -0400, Mike Furr wrote: What's the story with the ocamlgsl package that's in svn? Sylvain, it looks like you started to package it a couple of months ago and it never made it into the archive... Are there any problems with the package? Do you just

Re: ocamlgsl?

2004-04-09 Thread Michael Furr
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Hummm... You think it doesn't look quite finished, could you give me more detail ? I will fix whatever you want to upload it ( i made a promise to upstream about this, in fact ). I noticed two things: you need a build dep on gawk and the lines:

Re: ocamlgsl?

2004-04-09 Thread sylvain.le-gall
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 02:15:28PM -0400, Michael Furr wrote: On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Hummm... You think it doesn't look quite finished, could you give me more detail ? I will fix whatever you want to upload it ( i made a promise to upstream about this, in fact ).

Bug#242968: OCamlMake: pabc broken

2004-04-09 Thread John Goerzen
Package: ocaml-tools Version: 2004.03.18-1 Severity: normal With the pabc target, the following command is attempted: ocamlc -passopt -pack -I configparser/ -I /usr/include/ocaml/3.07 -I /usr/include/ocaml/3.07-ccopt -Lconfigparser/ \ -o jglib.cmo