Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:39:04 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301141: liblablgtk2-ocaml: Fails to install because of
wrong dependency on ocaml-base-3.08
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 12:56:42AM +0100, Bas Kloet wrote:
> Package: liblablgtk2-ocaml
> Version: 2.4.0+2004.11.19-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> This package depends on ocaml-base-3.08, but it should simply depend on
> ocaml-base. This renders it uninstallab
> If the package build-depends on ocaml, you will have to build it or it will
> FTBFS, which is an RC bug. If you tell us the remaining build-dependencies
> beyond just ocaml, i will tell you when you have to rebuild it, which should
> be rather trivial.
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.1.16), oca
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 301141 + pending
Bug#301141: liblablgtk2-ocaml: Fails to install because of wrong dependency on
ocaml-base-3.08
Tags were: sid
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Do you want inexpensive Valium?
http://www.pqer.com/p/viks/19
or 160 other drugs:
http://www.pqer.com/p/viks
you debt me measure me you superlunary me topsoil me you salish me bulldog me
you koran me shade me you g's me consanguineous me
you mollie me forgery me you factious me
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.11
> tags 301141 sid
Bug#301141: liblablgtk2-ocaml: Fails to install because of wrong dependency on
ocaml-base-3.08
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping pro
Package: liblablgtk2-ocaml
Version: 2.4.0+2004.11.19-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This package depends on ocaml-base-3.08, but it should simply depend on
ocaml-base. This renders it uninstallable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
A
Accepted:
camlidl_1.05-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/c/camlidl/camlidl_1.05-2.diff.gz
camlidl_1.05-2.dsc
to pool/main/c/camlidl/camlidl_1.05-2.dsc
camlidl_1.05-2_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/c/camlidl/camlidl_1.05-2_powerpc.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Thank you for your co
camlidl_1.05-2_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
camlidl_1.05-2.dsc
camlidl_1.05-2.diff.gz
camlidl_1.05-2_powerpc.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:05:43 +0100
Source: mlgtk
Binary: libmlgtk-ocaml-dev libmlgtk-ocaml
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 2.0.0-13
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Sven
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 22:22:41 +0100
Source: camlidl
Binary: camlidl
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.05-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers
Changed-By: Sylvain Le Gall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 08:40:56 +0100
Source: camlzip
Binary: libzip-ocaml libzip-ocaml-dev
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.01-15
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Sven Lu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:44:20 +0100
Source: lablgtk
Binary: liblablgtk-ocaml liblablgtk-ocaml-dev
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.2.7-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By:
Accepted:
lablgtk2_2.4.0+2005.02.18-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/lablgtk2/lablgtk2_2.4.0+2005.02.18-1.diff.gz
lablgtk2_2.4.0+2005.02.18-1.dsc
to pool/main/l/lablgtk2/lablgtk2_2.4.0+2005.02.18-1.dsc
lablgtk2_2.4.0+2005.02.18.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/lablgtk2/lablgtk2_2.4.0+2005.02.18.orig.tar.g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:08:31 +0100
Source: lablgtk2
Binary: liblablgtk2-ocaml liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 2.4.0+2005.02.18-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers
Change
lablgtk2_2.4.0+2005.02.18-1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lablgtk2_2.4.0+2005.02.18-1.dsc
lablgtk2_2.4.0+2005.02.18.orig.tar.gz
lablgtk2_2.4.0+2005.02.18-1.diff.gz
liblablgtk2-ocaml_2.4.0+2005.02.18-1_powerpc.deb
liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev_2.4.0+2005.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 04:34:38PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > BTW, the row of the graph are not exactly the dependency levels, it
> > seems that graphviz some time choose not to follow the rule I imagined.
> > Anyway the only package at level 1 listed higher in the graph seems to
> > be ocaml-to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:54:24 -0500
Source: mlgmp
Binary: libgmp-ocaml libgmp-ocaml-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 20021123-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Mike Furr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Mike Furr <
On 23/03/2005-19:40, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > If i did not miss any of those (Stefano, why does packages like ledit not
> > show
> > up ?).
>
>
> Should geneweb be listed here (see Julien Cristau rmeark about Stefano
> graph missing some packages)?
>
> I follow all this very loosely and n
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:05:37 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#269927: coqide segfaults on startup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 06:19:42PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > If i did not miss any of those (Stefano, why does packages like ledit not
> > show
> > up ?).
>
>
> Should geneweb be listed here (see Julien Cristau rmeark about Stefano
> graph missing some packages)?
>
> I follow all this
> If i did not miss any of those (Stefano, why does packages like ledit not show
> up ?).
Should geneweb be listed here (see Julien Cristau rmeark about Stefano
graph missing some packages)?
I follow all this very loosely and need to figure out whether I
absolutely need to rebuild it or not (as
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 269927 unreproducible
Bug#269927: coqide segfaults on startup
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Tags: unreproducible
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
This is a followup for bug :
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=269927
Samuel Mimram wrote:
Hello,
I just figured out that you do not have the last version of
labgtk2.0-0
(which is 2.4.9-1). Just in case, could you try to upgrad
Apologies, but I lost access to the IA64 workstation on which I saw that
bug. Sorry to bother everyone, but I guess it's best to close this bug.
If I run into it again in the future, I'll try to fix it myself.
Apologies once again,
Duraid
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
Hi
This is a followup for bug :
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=269927
>Samuel Mimram wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I just figured out that you do not have the last version of
>> labgtk2.0-0
>> (which is 2.4.9-1). Just in case, could you try to upgrade to
>> the last
>> version and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 08:52:49 +0100
Source: lablgl
Binary: liblablgl-ocaml-dev liblablgl-ocaml
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.01-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Sve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:04:47 +0100
Source: ocamlagrep
Binary: libagrep-ocaml libagrep-ocaml-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers
Changed-By: Samuel Mimr
Accepted:
libagrep-ocaml-dev_1.0-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/o/ocamlagrep/libagrep-ocaml-dev_1.0-4_i386.deb
libagrep-ocaml_1.0-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/o/ocamlagrep/libagrep-ocaml_1.0-4_i386.deb
ocamlagrep_1.0-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/o/ocamlagrep/ocamlagrep_1.0-4.diff.gz
ocamlagrep_1.0-4.dsc
to
ocamlagrep_1.0-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ocamlagrep_1.0-4.dsc
ocamlagrep_1.0-4.diff.gz
libagrep-ocaml-dev_1.0-4_i386.deb
libagrep-ocaml_1.0-4_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 04:25:56PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 04:16:14PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > If i did not miss any of those (Stefano, why does packages like ledit
> > not show up ?).
>
> It does, perhaps you downloaded an old version of the graph.
>
> > I
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 04:25:56PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 04:16:14PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > If i did not miss any of those (Stefano, why does packages like ledit
> > not show up ?).
>
> It does, perhaps you downloaded an old version of the graph.
Yep, pr
On 23/03/2005-16:09, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> ocaml 3.08.3-3 is now built everywhere, and in incoming, which means it will
> make the archive at dinstall time. When looking at :
>
> http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?email=&packages=ocaml&arches=
>
> one sees that only spa
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 04:16:14PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> If i did not miss any of those (Stefano, why does packages like ledit
> not show up ?).
It does, perhaps you downloaded an old version of the graph.
> I will go ahead and upload my package this evening (camlwip, spamoracle,
I already
Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 01:52:03PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Nice. One concern though: wouldn't it be possible to increase the
> > height, so we don't have the impression of it to be flattened?
>
> Not easily, graphviz uses an algorith for ty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:56:14 +0100
Source: ocaml-tools
Binary: ocaml-tools
Architecture: source all
Version: 2005.03.02-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers
Changed-By: Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROT
Quoting Thomas Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> BTW, many thanks to Jérôme, whose e-mail encouraged me to read the
> apt-cache manpage, which allowed me to discover a couple of interesting
> options that I wasn't aware of.
You're welcome :-)
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Accepted:
ocaml-tools_2005.03.02-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/o/ocaml-tools/ocaml-tools_2005.03.02-2.diff.gz
ocaml-tools_2005.03.02-2.dsc
to pool/main/o/ocaml-tools/ocaml-tools_2005.03.02-2.dsc
ocaml-tools_2005.03.02-2_all.deb
to pool/main/o/ocaml-tools/ocaml-tools_2005.03.02-2_all.deb
Announcing
Hello all,
ocaml 3.08.3-3 is now built everywhere, and in incoming, which means it will
make the archive at dinstall time. When looking at :
http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?email=&packages=ocaml&arches=
one sees that only sparc and arm are not yet installed, altough i don't know
wha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 02:29:19 +0100
Source: findlib
Binary: ocaml-findlib
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 1.0.4-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Stefano Zacchiro
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:17:42 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi all,
> having tags/ directory all over the svn repository is quite annoying
> since one have them in its working copy and that takes a lot of disk
> space.
>
> It would be better to have a single tags/ direct
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 03:17:42PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Hi all,
> having tags/ directory all over the svn repository is quite annoying
> since one have them in its working copy and that takes a lot of disk
> space.
>
> It would be better to have a single tags/ directory in the svn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 02:20:05 +0100
Source: fort
Binary: fort
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.4.2-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL P
ocaml-tools_2005.03.02-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ocaml-tools_2005.03.02-2.dsc
ocaml-tools_2005.03.02-2.diff.gz
ocaml-tools_2005.03.02-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
Hi all,
having tags/ directory all over the svn repository is quite annoying
since one have them in its working copy and that takes a lot of disk
space.
It would be better to have a single tags/ directory in the svn so that
one could easily have a working copy which does not contain it. If it is
You could maybe add a link to the archive of the commits ml:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ocaml-maint-commits/
Cheers,
Sam.
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I've fixed some bugs in the script and created a build-dep graph with
all ocaml related packages. It is available on the web page of
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 02:42:11PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Well, not sure, but a textual list is nice to have, but well.
It should be easily extractable from the .dot version of the graph, but
I accept volunteers for this task :)
> BTW, i wonder, can you access the Packages files, and coloriz
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 02:20:48PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> your list doesn't contain packages which build-dep on ocaml but don't
> depend on it (probably for most of them because they build native
> executables). I don't know whether this is intentional.
No, it is not intentional, I was sim
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 02:31:40PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 01:51:42PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > could you output a lit of all packages and their level of dependency from
> > ocaml ?
>
> Well, it is evident looking at the graph: bottom package (ocaml) is
> lev
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 01:51:42PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> could you output a lit of all packages and their level of dependency from
> ocaml ?
Well, it is evident looking at the graph: bottom package (ocaml) is
level 0, packages at row 1 (findlib, ocamlweb, camlidl, ...) are at
level 1 and so
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 01:55:26PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Is it normal that the list does not contain all ocaml-related packages ?
> (for example libsqlite-ocaml, libsdl-ocaml and so on). Is it because the
It is neither normal nor true :)
Both sqlite and sdl are contained, but they ar
On 23/03/2005-13:36, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Finally I also put there the list of ocaml related source packages.
> Could you please check if something is missing? That list is useful for
> a lot of automatic scripts and test, I would like to keep it up to date
> in the future.
>
Hi Stefano,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 01:52:03PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Nice. One concern though: wouldn't it be possible to increase the
> height, so we don't have the impression of it to be flattened?
Not easily, graphviz uses an algorith for typesetting graphs which is
completely automatic.
Anyway fr
Hello,
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Finally I also put there the list of ocaml related source packages.
Could you please check if something is missing? That list is useful for
a lot of automatic scripts and test, I would like to keep it up to date
in the future.
Is it normal that the list does not con
Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've fixed some bugs in the script and created a build-dep graph with
> all ocaml related packages. It is available on the web page of
> debian-ocaml-maint:
>
> http://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/ocaml_build_deps.png
Nice. One concern thou
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 01:43:45PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I've fixed some bugs in the script and created a build-dep graph with
> all ocaml related packages. It is available on the web page of
> debian-ocaml-maint:
>
> http://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/ocaml_build_deps.png
>
I've fixed some bugs in the script and created a build-dep graph with
all ocaml related packages. It is available on the web page of
debian-ocaml-maint:
http://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/ocaml_build_deps.png
While I was at it I also improved the web page adding links to our
packaging pol
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 11:10:56AM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Someone needs to add te feature to apt-cache then ;-)
Yes, wishlist bugreport on the run ... :)
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
[EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bon
Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 09:02:34AM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > BTW, IIRC, apt-cache is able to generate dependency graphs. By chance,
> > have you ever tried it?
>
> Jerome, you scared me, you know? :) I was not aware of that feature, but
> it
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 09:02:34AM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> BTW, IIRC, apt-cache is able to generate dependency graphs. By chance,
> have you ever tried it?
Jerome, you scared me, you know? :) I was not aware of that feature, but
it seems to me that it does not do what we need.
We indeed nee
Accepted:
ocamlweb_1.36-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/o/ocamlweb/ocamlweb_1.36-2.diff.gz
ocamlweb_1.36-2.dsc
to pool/main/o/ocamlweb/ocamlweb_1.36-2.dsc
ocamlweb_1.36-2_all.deb
to pool/main/o/ocamlweb/ocamlweb_1.36-2_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Thank you for your c
Accepted:
hlins_0.39-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/h/hlins/hlins_0.39-5.diff.gz
hlins_0.39-5.dsc
to pool/main/h/hlins/hlins_0.39-5.dsc
hlins_0.39-5_all.deb
to pool/main/h/hlins/hlins_0.39-5_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Accepted:
hevea_1.07.beta.2005.03.07-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/h/hevea/hevea_1.07.beta.2005.03.07-2.diff.gz
hevea_1.07.beta.2005.03.07-2.dsc
to pool/main/h/hevea/hevea_1.07.beta.2005.03.07-2.dsc
hevea_1.07.beta.2005.03.07-2_all.deb
to pool/main/h/hevea/hevea_1.07.beta.2005.03.07-2_all.deb
Annou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 08:54:28 +0100
Source: bibtex2html
Binary: bibtex2html
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.75-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers
Changed-By: Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Accepted:
bibtex2html_1.75-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/b/bibtex2html/bibtex2html_1.75-2.diff.gz
bibtex2html_1.75-2.dsc
to pool/main/b/bibtex2html/bibtex2html_1.75-2.dsc
bibtex2html_1.75-2_all.deb
to pool/main/b/bibtex2html/bibtex2html_1.75-2_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:36:53 +0100
Source: hevea
Binary: hevea
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.07.beta.2005.03.07-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers
Changed-By: Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTEC
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 03:02:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300951: fixed in hevea 1.07-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 03:02:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#291955: fixed in hevea 1.07-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:42:18 +0100
Source: hevea
Binary: hevea
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.07-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers
Changed-By: Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description
Accepted:
hevea_1.07-6.diff.gz
to pool/main/h/hevea/hevea_1.07-6.diff.gz
hevea_1.07-6.dsc
to pool/main/h/hevea/hevea_1.07-6.dsc
hevea_1.07-6_all.deb
to pool/main/h/hevea/hevea_1.07-6_all.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 291955 300951
Thank you for your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 22:38:54 +0100
Source: ocamlweb
Binary: ocamlweb
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.36-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers
Changed-By: Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Descr
bibtex2html_1.75-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
bibtex2html_1.75-2.dsc
bibtex2html_1.75-2.diff.gz
bibtex2html_1.75-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
ocamlweb_1.36-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ocamlweb_1.36-2.dsc
ocamlweb_1.36-2.diff.gz
ocamlweb_1.36-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
hlins_0.39-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
hlins_0.39-5.dsc
hlins_0.39-5.diff.gz
hlins_0.39-5_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
hevea_1.07.beta.2005.03.07-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
hevea_1.07.beta.2005.03.07-2.dsc
hevea_1.07.beta.2005.03.07-2.diff.gz
hevea_1.07.beta.2005.03.07-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
hevea_1.07-6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
hevea_1.07-6.dsc
hevea_1.07-6.diff.gz
hevea_1.07-6_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I wrote a script which given as input a list of packages name (either
> source or binaries) will output a graphviz .dot file with of the build
> dependencies among them.
>
> I run it on packages matching "*caml*" and find out the graph we should
>
77 matches
Mail list logo
