Bug#934872: RM: ocaml-usb/1.3.0-4 ocaml-sqlexpr/0.5.5-3 zeroinstall-injector/2.12.3-2 obus/1.1.5-6

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Dear Release Managers, Please remove the following packages from testing: * ocaml-usb, affected by #933993 * ocaml-sqlexpr, affected by #933994 * zeroinstall-injector, affected by #934340 *

[Git][ocaml-team/ppx-derivers] Pushed new tag upstream/1.2.1

Stéphane Glondu pushed new tag upstream/1.2.1 at Debian OCaml Maintainers / ppx-derivers -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ppx-derivers/tree/upstream/1.2.1 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

Bug#905940: convert package to dh-elpa

Hi Nicholas, On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 06:41:25PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Gentle ping, any progress on that MR review. sorry for the long non-reply. In fact I will first (hopefully tomorrow) upload an elpa-fied version of caml-mode, which is the new name upstream has chosen for the old

ocaml-mccs_1.1+10-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:libmccs-ocaml is NEW. binary:libmccs-ocaml-dev is NEW. binary:libmccs-ocaml is NEW. binary:libmccs-ocaml-dev is NEW. source:ocaml-mccs is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a goo

Processing of ocaml-mccs_1.1+10-1_amd64.changes

ocaml-mccs_1.1+10-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ocaml-mccs_1.1+10-1.dsc ocaml-mccs_1.1+10.orig.tar.xz ocaml-mccs_1.1+10-1.debian.tar.xz libmccs-ocaml-dbgsym_1.1+10-1_amd64.deb libmccs-ocaml-dev_1.1+10-1_amd64.deb libmccs-ocaml_1.1+10-1_amd64.de

Processed: Re: ITP: ocaml-mccs -- Stripped-down version of mccs, a CUDF problem solver, with OCaml bindings

Processing control commands: > tag 909091 + pending Bug #909091 [wnpp] ITP: ocaml-mccs -- Stripped-down version of mccs, a CUDF problem solver, with OCaml bindings Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #909091 to the same tags previously set > tag 908203 + pending Bug #908203 [opam] opam: Should

Processed: Re: ITP: ocaml-mccs -- Stripped-down version of mccs, a CUDF problem solver, with OCaml bindings

Processing control commands: > tag 909091 + pending Bug #909091 [wnpp] ITP: ocaml-mccs -- Stripped-down version of mccs, a CUDF problem solver, with OCaml bindings Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #909091 to the same tags previously set > tag 908203 + pending Bug #908203 [opam] opam: Should

Processed: Re: ITP: ocaml-mccs -- Stripped-down version of mccs, a CUDF problem solver, with OCaml bindings

Processing control commands: > tag 909091 + pending Bug #909091 [wnpp] ITP: ocaml-mccs -- Stripped-down version of mccs, a CUDF problem solver, with OCaml bindings Added tag(s) pending. > tag 908203 + pending Bug #908203 [opam] opam: Should not depend on aspcud any more Ignoring request to alter

Re: ITP: ocaml-mccs -- Stripped-down version of mccs, a CUDF problem solver, with OCaml bindings

Control: tag 909091 + pending Control: tag 908203 + pending Control: tag 907636 + pending On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 01:31:19AM +0200, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > Hi Ralf, > > I started the packaging work while preparing opam/2.0.5-1. > Hopefully I can get this out this week; otherwise, it will l

Re: dune + opam

Le 14/08/2019 à 12:14, Ralf Treinen a écrit : >> In ocaml-cairo2/debian/control, you wrote: >>> dune behaves differently when opam is installed >> >> so you put opam in Build-Conflicts. >> >> Could you elaborate? > > If I remember correctly, the problem was that "dune install" called > the opam_in