Package: libnumerix-ocaml-dev
Version: 0.19-5
Hi,
my little pet project's opt build-target was broken by the recent
package upgrade (transition to 3.08.3) because the two mentioned files
are missing.
Compiling the numerix source package and manually installing them solves
my issue, so it
Sven Luther a écrit :
Hello,
I would like to know if this bug was still present in the current version of
lablgtk2 in sarge ?
I don't know if it's the release in sarge, but I just rechecked the ones
I pointed as problematic with the current lablgtk2 in unstable, and on
those the result is:
*
Sven Luther a écrit :
* csview.ml:
File csview.ml, line 51, characters 4-6:
Syntax error
csview.ml uses stream parsers, which are provided by camlp4.
There is now a comment in the file:
(* Compile with
ocamlc -pp camlp4o -I +lablgtk2 lablgtk.cma csview.ml -o csview
or run with
lablgtk2
Package: libbatteries-ocaml-doc
Version: 0.20081112+gitBB342A7-1
The /usr/share/doc/libbatteries-ocaml-doc/examples/myocamlbuild.ml link
is broken.
Hope it helps,
Snark on #ocaml
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Package: ocaml-batteries-included
Severity: low
I was trying to apply the existing debian .diff.gz on the latest
batteries sources (alpha3) to obtain more recent packages, but failed to
build because ocamlnet wasn't installed -- although I had apt-get build-dep.
Hope this helps,
Snark on
Package: ocaml-nox
Version: 4.05.0-10
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I just took the scilab package out of orphanage, and I'm having a
problem : it has some caml code, but wants to compile it with ocamlopt,
which is not available on all architectures.
If you look at:
Package: ocaml
Version: 4.11.1-4
a part of scilab (modelica) is written in OCaml, but needs the -unsafe-
string switch ; unfortunately:
/usr/bin/ocaml: OCaml has been configured with -force-safe-string: -
unsafe-string is not available.
Can you please re-enable unsafe strings?
Thanks,
J.Puydt
Hi,
I wanted to have a look at how the team works (mathcomp will need
hierarchy-builder and coq-elpy, so perhaps some I could lend a hand).
But on this page:
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/OCamlTaskForce
a few links are dead (notably the policy, which I'll have to read from the
dh-ocaml
Le mardi 07 septembre 2021 à 13:30 +0200, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
> Le 06/09/2021 à 11:01, Julien Puydt a écrit :
> > The configure script checks for the availability of the switch, and
> > adds it to OCAMLCFLAGS... I checked String.set doesn't seem to be
> > used
> >
Le lundi 06 septembre 2021 à 10:44 +0200, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
> Le 06/09/2021 à 10:08, Julien Puydt a écrit :
> > > How come this is an issue only now? The transition to OCaml
> > > 4.11.1
> > > (the
> > > first version with unsafe strings
Hi
Le dimanche 29 août 2021 à 14:14 +0200, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
> Control: tags 993045 + wontfix
>
> Le 26/08/2021 à 21:42, Julien Puydt a écrit :
> > a part of scilab (modelica) is written in OCaml, but needs the -
> > unsafe-
> > string switch ; unfortunate
Package: dh-ocaml
Version: 1.1.3
Severity: wishlist
While trying to package coq-elpi, dh_ocaml found it exported units
already exported by other packages ; so far so good.
But it reports only the first one, not the whole list, so I would like
Cheers,
J.Puydt
PS: example of error message:
E:
Hi,
I could finally find some time for some digging.
Le mardi 23 novembre 2021 à 10:13 +0100, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
> Le 22/11/2021 à 10:45, Julien Puydt a écrit :
> > I'm trying to package coq-elpi (after I packaged elpi [in NEW], and
> > before I can package hi
Hi,
I updated src:coq, I uploaded src:elpi (to NEW).
I'm trying to create a nice package for coq-elpi, but I'm not sure
exactly how to do that.
The examples I have are coq's standard library and ssreflect. And
neither looks clean.
By this I mean that for coq, there's coq-theories, and it ships
Package: wnpp
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: coq-elpi
Version : 1.11.2
Upstream Author : Enrico Tassi
* URL : https://github.com/LPCIC/coq-elpi
* License : LGPL 2.1+
Programming Lang
Hi,
I'm starting to package my first Coq plugin, so I'm a bit unsure how to
proceed: there doesn't seem to be that many examples.
There are two libraries (src:coq-float and src:ssreflect) -- but they
provide coq theories, so they look like coq-theories (from src:coq): a
big number of .v, .vo,
tem /bin/bash, not /usr/bin/bash. Anyway, either bash
> should be replaced by /bin/sh, or we need a build-dependency on bash.
>
I saw the build was broken on a few architectures but didn't investigate
yet ; indeed I'll try get rid of that use of bash.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 11:40:37AM +0100,
Hi,
I'm still not satisfied with the coq package I prepared : lintian finds
too much to complain about.
PROBLEM I: shared-library-lacks-prerequisites lintian warnings
(many of them)
For example:
W: libcoq-ocaml: shared-library-lacks-prerequisites usr/lib/coq-
core/clib/clib.cmxs
My
Package: lintian
Version: 2.111.0
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
The Coq project comes with a kind of compiler, and generates files that
are ELF shared objects ; as such they do get detected by lintian, and
it tries to analyse them just like normal C/C++ shared objects.
Package: lintian
Version: 2.111.0
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
A new build system is seeing increasing use in the OCaml world, and is
putting the above hint implementation out of its depth: dune.
The current implementation of the hint is that for each foo.cmi, there
should
Hi,
Le mercredi 24 novembre 2021 à 08:23 +0100, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
>
> I've seen you've restricted the Architectures list of the coq
> package.
> Is this a temporary measure? Or is Coq definitely dropping support
> for bytecode architectures?
It's just a temporary measure ; I hope we'll
Le mardi 23 novembre 2021 à 10:09 +0100, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
>
> META is usually put in libfoobar-ocaml, as it contains the
> information to locate the *.cma and *.cmxs files (this information is
> used by anything using findlib as a lib, for example ocsigenserver).
Indeed, that's what's
Package: coq
Version: 8.14.0+dfsg-6
Severity: grave
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
Don't migrate to testing until the bytecode architectures' situation is
cleared.
Cheers,
J. Puydt
Hi,
I'm trying to package coq-elpi (after I packaged elpi [in NEW], and
before I can package hierarchy-builder), but dh_ocaml gives me an error
and I don't get it:
E: Error: unit Extfun exported in libcoq-elpi-ocaml-dev/libcoq-elpi-
ocaml v1.11.2-1 but already exported by camlp5 v7.14-1
But
Hi,
Le lundi 22 novembre 2021 à 09:01 +0100, Ralf Treinen a écrit :
>
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 08:04:44AM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote:
>
> > And for ssreflect, it ships a single libssreflect-coq package ;
> > it's
> > shipping .v, .vo and .glob files and the html doc.
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #999651 in coq reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Package: wnpp
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ocaml-ansi-terminal
Version : 0.8.2
Upstream Author : Christophe Troestler & Vincent Hugot
* URL : https://github.com/Chris00/ANSITerminal
* Lic
Hi,
I tried to have a look at the coq package (I need a newer version for
coq-elpi), and didn't quite get how to do that:
- debian/copyright says the source have to be edited, but doesn't say
how ;
- debian/README.source says gbp.conf does the trick and the version
name should have a +dfsg
Hi,
as I wrote to this list in august, I'm interested in coq theories, and
specifically mathcomp, which will soon require hierarchy-builder, wich
requires coq-elpi, which requires elpi.
I am a Debian developer and I am already part of a few teams (games,
javascript, python and science), so I
Package: wnpp
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: elpi
Version : 1.13.7
Upstream Author : Claudio Sacerdoti Coen and Enrico Tassi
* URL : https://github.com/LPCIC/elpi
* License : LGPL 2.1
Hi,
Le jeudi 28 octobre 2021 à 09:24 +0200, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
>
> Le 27/10/2021 à 18:40, Julien Puydt a écrit :
> > as I wrote to this list in august, I'm interested in coq theories,
> > and
> > specifically mathcomp, which will soon require hierarchy-builder,
&
Le jeudi 28 octobre 2021 à 09:24 +0200, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
>
> Feel free to push your git repository there.
>
Access request still pending.
I improved my elpi package, see
https://mentors.debian.net/packages/elpi/
I'm wondering why "ocamlfind list" shows its version as n/a.
The next
Hi,
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2021 à 09:03 +0100, Ralf Treinen a écrit :
>
> good to hear that you are joining the team and that you are interested
> in coq and related packages. The coq package is (again) lacking behind
> upstream, so we could definitely use some help here. I had uopdated the
>
Hi,
Le samedi 11 décembre 2021 à 17:38 -0500, Scott Kitterman a écrit :
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 22:59:57 +0100 Julien Puydt
>
> wrote:
> > Package: ftp.debian.org
> > Usertags: rm
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
> >
> > Upstream decide
Package: ftp.debian.org
Usertags: rm
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
Upstream decided those architectures weren't supported anymore ; I
removed support for them from my last upload, but they still have old
binary packages lying around in the unstable archive, and those should
Package: ftp.debian.org
Usertags: rm
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
Since coq upstream abandoned some architecture, coq isn't available
anymore on those architectures, and lingering binary packages prevent
testing migration.
Apparently the coq binary packages can't be removed
Package: ftp.debian.org
Usertags: rm
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
Since coq upstream abandoned some architecture, coq isn't available
anymore on those architectures, and lingering binary packages prevent
testing migration.
Apparently the coq binary packages can't be removed
Package: ftp.debian.org
Usertags: rm
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
Since coq upstream abandoned some architecture, coq isn't available
anymore on those architectures, and lingering binary packages prevent
testing migration.
Apparently the coq binary packages can't be removed
Package: ftp.debian.org
Usertags: rm
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
Since coq upstream abandoned some architecture, coq isn't available
anymore on those architectures, and lingering binary packages prevent
testing migration.
Apparently the coq binary packages can't be removed
Package: ftp.debian.org
Usertags: rm
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
Since coq upstream abandoned some architecture, coq isn't available
anymore on those architectures, and lingering binary packages prevent
testing migration.
Apparently the coq binary packages can't be removed
Hi
Le mar. 11 janv. 2022 à 08:15, Ralf Treinen a écrit :
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 08:39:25AM +0100, Julien Puydt wrote:
> > Package: ftp.debian.org
> > Usertags: rm
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
> >
> > Since coq upstream abandoned some
Hi,
I checked that next upstream (currently at RC1 stage) has a fix for
that ; depending on the schedule of that next upstream, I'll either
adapt the patch for us or wait for it.
Cheers,
J.Puydt
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1003586 in coq reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Hi,
Le vendredi 18 mars 2022 à 08:43 +0100, Ralf Treinen a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 05:20:58PM +0100,
> julien.pu...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > I didn't upload it because the reverse deps situation wasn't
> > perfect:
>
> Can you upload to experimental, please ? -Ralf.
I never think about
Hi,
Le vendredi 18 mars 2022 à 08:21 +0100, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
> Le 17/03/2022 à 17:20, julien.pu...@gmail.com a écrit :
> > I updated menhir on salsa to the last upstream -- and in the
> > process,
> > it got a +ds suffix because I kicked the prebuilt documentation out
> menhir is a
Hi,
Le lundi 14 mars 2022 à 19:50 +0100, Ralf Treinen a écrit :
>
> Do others on this list have any thoughts about that?
There are several points to take into account:
(1) I dropped support for some architectures in the Debian package for
coq, until upstream fixes them:
Le mercredi 23 février 2022 à 13:21 +0100, Andreas Beckmann a écrit :
> With all these B-D added, the build fails for me now with
>
> Running[3870]: (cd _build/default/doc && /usr/bin/env sphinx-build -q
> -W -b html sphinx refman-html)
> Command [3870] exited with code 2:
> $ (cd
Hi,
Le mercredi 23 février 2022 à 13:21 +0100, Andreas Beckmann a écrit :
> With all these B-D added, the build fails for me now with
>
> Not sure what exactly causes the failure ...
It's an heisenbug:
- I added a patch to get more log ;
- I tried to build the package: success ;
- I tried
Hi,
I was looking around at all coq-related packages and found this poor
thing, which seems pretty dead.
I propose to ask for its removal ; I'll proceed in a few weeks if
nobody objects.
Cheers,
J.Puydt
Hi,
I'm trying to get more of the coq ecosystem into Debian. There are
several things I would like to package -- but first I think I need to
consolidate what's already there.
Here is a list of issues I have, on which I would need feedback ; I put
explicit "Question: ..." to make it clearer what
Hi,
Le mardi 29 mars 2022 à 23:23 +0200, Ralf Treinen a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 09:52:16AM +0200,
> julien.pu...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Le lundi 28 mars 2022 à 08:14 +0200, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
>
> > > > Question: shouldn't I split the current libcoq-elpi in a
> > > >
Hi,
Le lundi 28 mars 2022 à 08:14 +0200, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
> Le 24/03/2022 à 21:59, julien.pu...@gmail.com a écrit :
> > Question: how are such things done? (pointers to code and/or
> > documentation are welcome)
>
> I am not aware of a consolidated documentation for that :-( I will
>
Le lundi 28 mars 2022 à 08:14 +0200, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
> Le 24/03/2022 à 21:59, julien.pu...@gmail.com a écrit :
> > Question: shouldn't I split the current libcoq-elpi in a libcoq-
> > elpi
> > for the purely coq part and a libcoq-elpi-ocaml packages for the
> > .cma/.cmxs pair?
>
> This
Hi,
I just changed the binary packages provided by the source coq package
to follow more closely upstream's subpackages. I used
Provides+Breaks+Replaces so things should go smoothly.
Now I would like to work on other things:
(1) the source package coq-doc (non-free) should be updated to latest
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: mathcomp-finmap
Version : 1.5.1
Upstream Author : Cyril Cohen
* URL : https://github.com/math-comp/finmap
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: mathcomp-bigenough
Version : 1.5.1
Upstream Author : Cyril Cohen
* URL : https://github.com/math-comp
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: mathcomp-analysis
Version : 0.3.13
Upstream Author : Reynald Affeldt, Cyril Cohen, Assia Mahboubi,
Damien Rouhling
Hi,
upstream didn't release a new version with support for camlp5 8.* ; but
they have a patch here:
https://github.com/LPCIC/elpi/pull/110/commits/f58341831b56ccfe5f2f49158c600e4e36bcb9b5
so I should be able to fix the problem as soon as it actually occurs.
Cheers,
J.Puydt
Hi,
now camlp5 8.* is in unstable the problem occurs ; I'm just waiting for
the other b-deps to be available, but I have a commit ready.
Cheers,
J.Puydt
Le vendredi 18 mars 2022 à 08:43 +0100, Ralf Treinen a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 05:20:58PM +0100,
> julien.pu...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > I didn't upload it because the reverse deps situation wasn't
> > perfect:
>
> Can you upload to experimental, please ? -Ralf.
>
I found I needed the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers
* Package name: pstm2-frontend
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Albin Coquereau
* URL : https://github.com/ACoquereau/psmt2-frontend
* License : Apache-2
Le lundi 18 septembre 2023 à 10:32 +0200, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
> Le 18/09/2023 à 10:04, Julien Puydt a écrit :
> > I agree with that plan ; can you list which packages get broken in
> > each
> > case?
>
> I've attached the lists of (OPAM) packages that cannot
Hi
Le lun. 18 sept. 2023, 09:37, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
>
> OCaml 5.1.0 has just been released, and a version 4.14.2 will soon be
> released. Current version in unstable is 4.13.1.
>
> I played a bit with opam-debian-switch, and it turns out that (at least)
> 35 packages are broken (at the
Le samedi 19 août 2023 à 20:58 +0200, Helmut Grohne a écrit :
> Control: reopen -1
> Control: found -1 mathcomp-analysis/0.6.4-2
>
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 05:33:11PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System
> wrote:
> > It has been closed by Debian FTP Masters
> &
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1044637 in coq reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Le mercredi 23 août 2023 à 09:07 +0100, Simon McVittie a écrit :
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 at 08:41:44 +0200, julien.pu...@gmail.com wrote:
> > let's lower the severity to avoid blocking migration during the
> > discussion -- after all the Breaks already avoids the file conflict
> > issue.
>
> Sorry,
Control: severity -1 normal
Hi,
let's lower the severity to avoid blocking migration during the
discussion -- after all the Breaks already avoids the file conflict
issue.
Cheers,
J.Puydt
Le mardi 22 août 2023 à 08:34 +0200, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
>
> This situation is explicitly covered in Policy 7.3 and 7.6.1.
Section 7.3 explains why the Breaks is needed when there are file
conflicts ; we agree on that point and hence 0.6.4-2 got it.
Section 7.6 is about partial and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers ,
jpu...@debian.org
* Package name: mathcomp-algebra-tactics
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : Kazuhiko Sakaguchi
* URL : https://github.com/math-comp/algebra-tactics
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers ,
jpu...@debian.org
* Package name: mathcomp-zify
Version : 1.2.0+1.12+8.13
Upstream Author : Kazuhiko Sakaguchi
* URL : https://github.com/math-comp/mczify
* License
Le vendredi 18 mars 2022 à 08:43 +0100, Ralf Treinen a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 05:20:58PM +0100,
> julien.pu...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > I didn't upload it because the reverse deps situation wasn't
> > perfect:
>
> Can you upload to experimental, please ? -Ralf.
>
As far as I know the
Hi,
I updated menhir on salsa to the last upstream -- and in the process,
it got a +ds suffix because I kicked the prebuilt documentation out.
I didn't upload it because the reverse deps situation wasn't perfect:
- liquidsoap has an unsatisfied libogg-ocaml-dev dep) -- unrelated
breakage ;
-
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: jpu...@debian.org, debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
This package has been abandoned upstream for years (last release tagged 2 Dec
2019).
It's in FTBFS since years (bug #970453, filed Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:19:03 +0200).
I proposed its
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org, jpu...@debian.org
* Package name: coq-serapi
Version : 0.15.0
Upstream Author : Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias et al
* URL : https://github.com/ejgallego/coq-serapi
Hi,
I thought my upload of 20220511-manganese-1.1 fixed the autopkgtest
issues with the package. After all, it just worked here!
But it looks like it's still failing on the Debian autopkgtest
infrastructure:
autopkgtest [21:19:22]: test eva: [---
[kernel] User Error: cannot
Hi,
one of frama-c's autopkgtest was failing because of:
[kernel] User Error: [findlib] package 'ppx_import' not found (required
by `frama-c.kernel')
[kernel] User Error: Deferred error message was emitted during
execution. See above messages for more information.
That was because the
Le mercredi 06 juillet 2022 à 21:50 +, Thorsten Alteholz a écrit :
>
> please also mention INRIA and University of Gothenburg in your
> debian/copyright
> At least they were mentioned in some file headers ...
>
I think I mention them in there already:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers ,
jpu...@debian.org
* Package name: coq-equations
Version : 1.3-8.15
Upstream Author : Matthieu Sozeau and Cyprien Mangin
* URL : https://github.com/mattam82/Coq-Equations
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers ,
jpu...@debian.org
* Package name: coq-stdpp
Version : 1.7.0
Upstream Author : std++ team
* URL : https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp
* License : BSD-3-clause
Hi,
Le jeudi 07 juillet 2022 à 18:00 +, Thorsten Alteholz a écrit :
>
> please mention the LGPL in your debian/copyright.
>
Done in a new upload:
coq-hott (8.15-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Drop an erroneous b-dep on ocamlgraph.
* Complete d/copyright.
-- Julien Puydt
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers ,
jpu...@debian.org
* Package name: coq-simple-io
Version : 1.7.0
Upstream Author : Li-yao Xia
* URL : https://github.com/coq-community/coq-simple-io
* License : Expat
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers ,
jpu...@debian.org
* Package name: flocq
Version : 4.1.0
Upstream Author : Sylvie Boldo, Guillaume Melquiond
* URL : https://flocq.gitlabpages.inria.fr/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers ,
jpu...@debian.org
* Package name: ott
Version : 0.32
Upstream Author : Peter Sewell, Francesco Zappa Nardelli, Scott Owens et al
* URL : https://github.com/ott-lang/ott
Hi,
Le jeudi 07 juillet 2022 à 19:00 +, Thorsten Alteholz a écrit :
>
> please mention the LGPL and INRIA in your debian/copyright.
Done:
coq-math-classes (8.15.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Complete d/copyright.
-- Julien Puydt Fri, 08 Jul 2022 08:06:04 +0200
Hi,
Le vendredi 08 juillet 2022 à 23:00 +, Thorsten Alteholz a écrit :
>
> please also mention at least doc/*
Why doc/* ? I checked again and didn't see anything special.
> and INRIA, CNRS et al. in your debian/copyright.
Ok, adding:
Files: theories/*/Relation*.v
Copyright: 1999-2018
Hi,
Le samedi 09 juillet 2022 à 18:00 +, Thorsten Alteholz a écrit :
>
> please also mention at least the "Artistic License", the Q Public
> License version 1.0 and the LGPL in your debian/copyright.
I found where the Artistic and Q Public Licenses are used and completed
d/copyright with
Package: libatd-ocaml-dev
Version: 2.4.1-1
Severity: wishlist
I need ocaml-atd version 2.9.1 to update the elpi package.
For this, I need a more recent jsonschema which we should get only in
september.
This report is to leave a trail of this information.
Cheers,
J.Puydt
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers ,
jpu...@debian.org
* Package name: coq-menhirlib
Version : 20220210
Upstream Author : Jacques-Henri Jourdan
* URL : https://coquelicot.inria.fr/fpottier/menhir
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers ,
jpu...@debian.org
* Package name: coq-hott
Version : 8.15
Upstream Author : Andrej Bauer, Jason Gross, Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine, Michael
Shulman, Bas Pitters
* URL : https
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers ,
jpu...@debian.org
* Package name: coq-ext-lib
Version : 0.11.6
Upstream Author : Gregory M. Malecha
* URL : https://github.com/coq-community/coq-ext-lib
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers ,
jpu...@debian.org
* Package name: coqeal
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Guillaume Cano, Cyril Cohen, Maxime Dénès, Anders Mörtberg,
Vincent Siles
* URL : https
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers ,
jpu...@debian.org
* Package name: coq-math-classes
Version : 8.15.0
Upstream Author : Eelis van der Weegen, Bas Spitters, Robbert Krebbers
* URL : https://github.com/coq
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers ,
jpu...@debian.org
* Package name: ocaml-pprint
Version : 20220103
Upstream Author : François Pottier, Nicolas Pouillard, etc
* URL : https://github.com/fpottier/pprint
Hi,
here is some very preliminary code for dh-coq, which should avoid
breaking user systems with every upload. Indeed, each time I upload one
of the libcoq-* packages, it introduces inconsistent assumptions that
break other packages (none or all depending on the dep graph). The goal
here is that
Hi,
the Coq software is DFSG-free provided by the src:coq package. But its
documentation is under the OPL-1.0 -- hence not DFSG-free because of
restrictions on modification [see 1 below].
In the users' interest this documentation has hence been split in a
non-free src:coq-doc package providing
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers ,
jpu...@debian.org
* Package name: coq-reglang
Version : 1.1.3
Upstream Author : Christian Doczkal, Jan-Oliver Kaiser, Gert Smolka
* URL : https://github.com/coq-community
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers ,
jpu...@debian.org
* Package name: coq-unimath
Version : 20220204
Upstream Author : Benedikt Ahrens, Daniel Grayson, Vladimir Voevodsky
* URL : https://github.com/UniMath
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers ,
jpu...@debian.org
* Package name: coq-unicoq
Version : 1.6-8.15-1
Upstream Author : Beta Ziliani & Matthieu Sozeau
* URL : https://github.com/unicoq/unicoq/
* Lic
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers ,
jpu...@debian.org
* Package name: coq-relation-algebra
Version : 1.7.7
Upstream Author : Damien Pous et al
* URL : http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/damien.pous/ra
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Puydt
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers ,
jpu...@debian.org
* Package name: coq-quickchick
Version : 1.6.3
Upstream Author : Leonidas Lampropoulos, Zoe Paraskevopoulou, Maxime Denes,
Catalin Hritcu, Benjamin Pierce, Li-yao Xia
1 - 100 of 485 matches
Mail list logo
