On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Sven Luther wrote:
Now, what is the best practice to bring this tihng again in the main
trunk ? Move the trunk out of the way, and svn mv the branch to the
trunk ? Mike, you did a svn cp when you first created it, right ?
Yes, I just followed the example of the svn book.
On Tue, 11 May 2004, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 08:54:17PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
IMO the package should be changed so that Slong module isn't available
on architecture on which it's not supported. Applications can indeed
want to build-depend on that module for
On Tue, 4 May 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, i propose the same patch to upstream. He reply me with a simple
answer : yep, it will compile, but it also will produce a bus error on
those architecture .
Hmm.. that sucks :-(
That is the reason why i exclude those arch from the build.
Okay.
On Tue, 4 May 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, i propose the same patch to upstream. He reply me with a simple
answer : yep, it will compile, but it also will produce a bus error on
those architecture .
Hmm.. that sucks :-(
That is the reason why i exclude those arch from the build.
Okay.
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
- removed dependency on cryptokit from ocaml-libs (crytpokit is not
really a fundamantal library and a package on which it depends is
actually heavily bugged)
Out of curiousity, which package is this(which is so buggy)? The
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... Hummm... You think it doesn't look quite finished, could you give
me more detail ? I will fix whatever you want to upload it ( i made a
promise to upstream about this, in fact ).
I noticed two things: you need a build dep on gawk and the lines:
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... Hummm... You think it doesn't look quite finished, could you give
me more detail ? I will fix whatever you want to upload it ( i made a
promise to upstream about this, in fact ).
I noticed two things: you need a build dep on gawk and the lines:
On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Ralf Treinen wrote:
Mike, thanks a lot for the patch. I'll look into this and upload
the patched package over the weekend.
I just realize that I forgot to clean it up before sending. It really
should only include the changes in debian/control and debian/rules. Sorry
about
On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Ralf Treinen wrote:
Mike, thanks a lot for the patch. I'll look into this and upload
the patched package over the weekend.
I just realize that I forgot to clean it up before sending. It really
should only include the changes in debian/control and debian/rules. Sorry
about
9 matches
Mail list logo
