2005/5/21, Sylvain LE GALL [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
Well, i was preparing to go on holiday, when i received a RC
bugs on ocamlgsl yesterday ;-
The fix is ready in the SVN repository. It just need to be uploaded to
unstable and to deal with release-manager to get it included in Sarge.
Hi all,
Well, i was preparing to go on holiday, when i received a RC
bugs on ocamlgsl yesterday ;-
The fix is ready in the SVN repository. It just need to be uploaded to
unstable and to deal with release-manager to get it included in Sarge.
The fix is minor : add a dependency on libgsl0-dev.
On Tue, 4 May 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, i propose the same patch to upstream. He reply me with a simple
answer : yep, it will compile, but it also will produce a bus error on
those architecture .
Hmm.. that sucks :-(
That is the reason why i exclude those arch from the build.
Okay.
Hello,
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 11:17:51AM -0400, Michael Furr wrote:
On Tue, 4 May 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, i propose the same patch to upstream. He reply me with a simple
answer : yep, it will compile, but it also will produce a bus error on
those architecture .
Hmm.. that
Hello,
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 09:31:54PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
per ocamlgsl,
There's no reason to take sparc and hppa out of the arch list. The
only problem is in the way ocamlgsl is using ocaml's foreign function
interface(Double_val is actually a function, not a macro on these
On Tue, 4 May 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, i propose the same patch to upstream. He reply me with a simple
answer : yep, it will compile, but it also will produce a bus error on
those architecture .
Hmm.. that sucks :-(
That is the reason why i exclude those arch from the build.
Okay.
Hello,
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 11:17:51AM -0400, Michael Furr wrote:
On Tue, 4 May 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, i propose the same patch to upstream. He reply me with a simple
answer : yep, it will compile, but it also will produce a bus error on
those architecture .
Hmm.. that
per ocamlgsl,
There's no reason to take sparc and hppa out of the arch list. The
only problem is in the way ocamlgsl is using ocaml's foreign function
interface(Double_val is actually a function, not a macro on these
archs). So applying the attached 2 line patch will make it build.
I didn't
Hello all,
As usual, i come to ask for sponsored upload.
The RFS for ocamlgraph fixes a RC bugs, and i really would like to see
ocamlgraph enter sarge...
If any one is willing to help a poor non DD ;-)
Thanks in advance
Kind regard
Sylvain Le Gall
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hello,
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 09:31:54PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
per ocamlgsl,
There's no reason to take sparc and hppa out of the arch list. The
only problem is in the way ocamlgsl is using ocaml's foreign function
interface(Double_val is actually a function, not a macro on these
Hello all,
As usual, i come to ask for sponsored upload.
The RFS for ocamlgraph fixes a RC bugs, and i really would like to see
ocamlgraph enter sarge...
If any one is willing to help a poor non DD ;-)
Thanks in advance
Kind regard
Sylvain Le Gall
11 matches
Mail list logo
