Le 14/08/2019 à 21:14, Kyle Robbertze a écrit :
>> Since we are at it : I am also in favour of demanding debian/rules to
>> use dh, and not cdbs.
>
> Sounds good. This is in-line with policy sentiment too. I'm slowly
> working through the packages I look after and moving them over as new
>
Le 14/08/2019 à 12:14, Ralf Treinen a écrit :
>> In ocaml-cairo2/debian/control, you wrote:
>>> dune behaves differently when opam is installed
>>
>> so you put opam in Build-Conflicts.
>>
>> Could you elaborate?
>
> If I remember correctly, the problem was that "dune install" called
> the
Le 14/08/2019 à 20:32, Ralf Treinen a écrit :
>> Please provide a version of dose3 that works with -safe-string. Note:
>> this can be done before OCaml is updated because the current version in
>> unstable (4.05.0) already supports -safe-strings.
>
> Thanks for having fixed this. Can you please
Stéphane Glondu pushed new tag archive/debian/5.0.1-14 at Debian OCaml
Maintainers / dose3
--
View it on GitLab:
https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/dose3/tree/archive/debian/5.0.1-14
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.
Stéphane Glondu pushed new tag debian/5.0.1-14 at Debian OCaml Maintainers /
dose3
--
View it on GitLab:
https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/dose3/tree/debian/5.0.1-14
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.
Hi Nicholas,
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 06:41:25PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Gentle ping, any progress on that MR review.
sorry for the long non-reply. In fact I will first (hopefully tomorrow)
upload an elpa-fied version of caml-mode, which is the new name upstream
has chosen for the old
ocaml-mccs_1.1+10-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ocaml-mccs_1.1+10-1.dsc
ocaml-mccs_1.1+10.orig.tar.xz
ocaml-mccs_1.1+10-1.debian.tar.xz
libmccs-ocaml-dbgsym_1.1+10-1_amd64.deb
libmccs-ocaml-dev_1.1+10-1_amd64.deb
binary:libmccs-ocaml is NEW.
binary:libmccs-ocaml-dev is NEW.
binary:libmccs-ocaml is NEW.
binary:libmccs-ocaml-dev is NEW.
source:ocaml-mccs is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a
Control: tag 909091 + pending
Control: tag 908203 + pending
Control: tag 907636 + pending
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 01:31:19AM +0200, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
>
> I started the packaging work while preparing opam/2.0.5-1.
> Hopefully I can get this out this week; otherwise, it will
Processing control commands:
> tag 909091 + pending
Bug #909091 [wnpp] ITP: ocaml-mccs -- Stripped-down version of mccs, a CUDF
problem solver, with OCaml bindings
Added tag(s) pending.
> tag 908203 + pending
Bug #908203 [opam] opam: Should not depend on aspcud any more
Ignoring request to alter
Processing control commands:
> tag 909091 + pending
Bug #909091 [wnpp] ITP: ocaml-mccs -- Stripped-down version of mccs, a CUDF
problem solver, with OCaml bindings
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #909091 to the same tags previously set
> tag 908203 + pending
Bug #908203 [opam] opam: Should
Processing control commands:
> tag 909091 + pending
Bug #909091 [wnpp] ITP: ocaml-mccs -- Stripped-down version of mccs, a CUDF
problem solver, with OCaml bindings
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #909091 to the same tags previously set
> tag 908203 + pending
Bug #908203 [opam] opam: Should
Stéphane Glondu pushed new tag upstream/1.2.1 at Debian OCaml Maintainers /
ppx-derivers
--
View it on GitLab:
https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ppx-derivers/tree/upstream/1.2.1
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Dear Release Managers,
Please remove the following packages from testing:
* ocaml-usb, affected by #933993
* ocaml-sqlexpr, affected by #933994
* zeroinstall-injector, affected by #934340
14 matches
Mail list logo
