Package: lablgtk2
Severity: normal
Hi,
pygtksourceview1 is deprecated and dead upstream.
Your package provides bindings for it though, and 4 packages build
depend on it. We want to remove it from the archive, so it would
be nice if you could look at what possibilities we have to remove
it. Maybe
On 20/06/15 18:02, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 19/06/2015 12:56, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>> > I see some of the failing packages have in the log:
>> >
>> > -> Finished parsing the build-deps
>> > Wrong version of OCaml!
>> >
>
On 22/06/15 19:15, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 22/06/2015 15:59, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>> Or if you can give a more detailed explanation of what will happen after
>> ocaml
>> is uploaded, binNMUs are scheduled, and we have ~30 packages that are holding
>> th
On 07/09/15 17:45, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Now that gcc-5 migrated, can anyone give an ETA for the OCaml transition?
Has the situation improved wrt the last status update? Can you give an update?
Cheers,
Emilio
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 05/10/15 10:39, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 30/09/2015 19:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>>> Now that gcc-5 migrated, can anyone give an ETA for the OCaml transition?
>>
>> Has the situation improved wrt the last status update? Ca
ocaml just went in after llvm got fixed and removing a few packages
remove nurpawiki/1.2.3-8 eliom/4.0.0-2 cduce/0.6.0-1 otags/4.01.1-1 botch/0.16-2
matita/0.99.1-3 liquidsoap/1.1.1-7
age-days 1 hivex/1.3.13-1
age-days 3 coccinelle/1.0.3.deb-2
age-days 0 llvm-toolchain-3.4/1:3.4.2-16
Cheers,
Emil
Source: ocaml-re2
Version: 113.00.00+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Your package failed to build against the new re2:
g++ -O2 -DPIC -fPIC -g -pipe -DCAML_NAME_SPACE -Wall -I. -I../../../include \
-I/usr/lib/ocaml -c stubs.cpp
In file included from /usr/include/c++/5/mutex:35:0,
from /u
Source: sexplib310
Version: 113.33.03-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package no longer builds libsexplib-camlp4-dev, and the
new libsexplib-ocaml-dev doesn't provide it. This would be
fine if it weren't for the number of reverse dependencies
that build-depend on it:
* source package sexplib310 ver
On 14/09/17 15:44, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Stéphane Glondu:
>> On 15/08/2017 22:16, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>> [...]
>>>> ocaml 4.05.0 and a few selected packages have been uploaded to
>>>> experimental a
On 23/09/17 15:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 14/09/17 15:44, Ximin Luo wrote:
>> Stéphane Glondu:
>>> On 15/08/2017 22:16, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>>> [...]
>>>>> ocaml 4.05.0 and a few selec
On 22/05/18 09:33, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Gringo has an RC bug which causes an FTBFS. While the package is fixed in
> Unstable, its migration to testing is blocked by python3.6 at the moment.
>
> I'd like to fix Gringo in testing to avoid removal of many OCaml packages
> from testing. Th
On 29/08/2019 12:08, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2019-08-29 11:46, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 29/08/2019 11:17, Philipp Kern wrote:
>>> On 2019-08-29 11:14, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> Why don't you let the interested teams run the scripts and gene
On 16/07/2024 13:16, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 10:25:43AM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Hi,
Hi Stéphane,
Le 27/06/2024 à 11:38, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
The remaining unknowns are llvm-toolchain-{14,15,16,17,18}... [...]
I've done a rebuild of the OCaml universe with yes
On 17/07/2024 21:56, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 11:28:04AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 16/07/2024 13:16, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 10:25:43AM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Hi,
Hi Stéphane,
Le 27/06/2024 à 11:38, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
The
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 25/07/2024 10:54, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 17/07/2024 21:56, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 11:28:04AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 16/07/2024 13:16, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 10:25:43AM +0200, Stéphane Glondu
On 12/08/2024 07:37, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Le 07/08/2024 à 10:18, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
Let's go ahead with this one.
The needed recompilations are mostly done.
As expected, removal hints will be needed, which I've put in 3 categories:
# Independent broken packages
On 07/02/2023 20:00, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2023-02-07 17:50 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Tue, 2023-02-07 at 16:41:47 +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
When building packages, a -ffile-prefix-map option is automatically injected
into CFLAGS. Where does it come from? Since when?
This is coming
On 13/08/2024 08:03, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Dear Emilio,
Le 12/08/2024 à 10:31, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
As expected, removal hints will be needed, which I've put in 3 categories:
# Independent broken packages
hol-light (#1073882)
ocaml-ffmpeg (#1072440)
ocaml-lo (#10
18 matches
Mail list logo
