Bug#295831: marked as done (openoffice.org-kde depends on an unavailable package)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:26:27 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#295831: openoffice.org-kde depends on an unavailable package has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#295900: Depends on gnomelibs

Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: WTF? did you not reopen the old bug but file a new one? sorry, i get really annoyed when people close a bug without actually fixing it (and in this case introducing it since it wasn't there before, at least for i386). isn't this the debian way? :-(

Bug#295900: Depends on gnomelibs

Hi. Alex Romosan wrote: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: WTF? did you not reopen the old bug but file a new one? sorry, i get really annoyed when people close a bug without actually fixing it (and in this case introducing it since it wasn't there gar. Get a clue. We mentioned in

CVS:oo-deb/debian changelog,1.427,1.428

Update of /cvs/debian-openoffice/oo-deb/debian In directory gluck:/tmp/cvs-serv14954 Modified Files: changelog Log Message: mention fixed vfs-uno-uri.diff Index: changelog === RCS file:

Processing of openoffice.org_1.1.3-6_source+i386+all.changes

openoffice.org_1.1.3-6_source+i386+all.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: openoffice.org-l10n-ru_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-ja_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-thesaurus-en-us_1.1.3-6_all.deb openoffice.org-l10n-cy_1.1.3-6_all.deb

Bug#293551: marked as done (openoffice.org-bin: Depends on gnomelibs.)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 19:04:57 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#293551: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.3-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

openoffice.org_1.1.3-6_source+i386+all.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: openoffice.org-bin_1.1.3-6_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-bin_1.1.3-6_i386.deb openoffice.org-dev_1.1.3-6_i386.deb to pool/main/o/openoffice.org/openoffice.org-dev_1.1.3-6_i386.deb openoffice.org-evolution_1.1.3-6_i386.deb to

Bug#295900: marked as done (Depends on gnomelibs)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 19:04:57 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#293551: fixed in openoffice.org 1.1.3-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#295916: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#295916: openoffice.org-bin: installs unstripped (huge) binaries)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes: ca. 40 M - 60M. How's that 60M bigger? For the record, I was referring to Installed-Size, not Size, and probably should have been clearer about that. At any rate, it was about a 50% increase either way. It's now at the old size again

Bug#293767: marked as done (openoffice.org-kde: er, it doesn't work :()

Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:27:57 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the

Bug#296087: IMPORTANT: Microsoft EULA is NON-FREE and give MS specific rights!!

Package: openoffice.org Version: 1.1.1-3 Severity: grave Hello, This is a SEVERE thing. I installed Debian/Sarge's version 1.1.1 of openoffice. While doing backups I found: /home/xxx/.openoffice/1.1.1/THIRDPARTYLICENSEREADME.html which contains the full Microsoft EULA: (see clip

Re: Bug#296087: IMPORTANT: Microsoft EULA is NON-FREE and give MS specific rights!!

On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 01:25 -0500, John D. Hendrickson wrote: Package: openoffice.org Version: 1.1.1-3 Severity: grave Hello, This is a SEVERE thing. I installed Debian/Sarge's version 1.1.1 of openoffice. While doing backups I found: