On 2012/03/16 00:36, Lionel Elie Mamane said:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:48:05PM +0800, imacat wrote:
>> On 2012/03/15 23:26, Lionel Elie Mamane said:
>>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:18:38AM +0800, imacat wrote:
> If you were to go forward with this, "right of use" of the
> debian-openoffice maili
Sorry, I almost forgot. To be noted,
On 2012/03/16 00:29, Rene Engelhard said:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:25:07AM +0800, imacat wrote:
>
>> * Discrimination against Apache OpenOffice's people
>> - That *funny* so
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 664020 1:3.4.5-5
Bug #664020 [libreoffice-gtk] libreoffice-calc: Invisible checkboxes in dialogs
with Raleigh Gtk Theme
Marked as found in versions libreoffice/1:3.4.5-5.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 664020 libreoffice-calc: Invisible checkboxes in dialogs with Raleigh
> Gtk Theme
Bug #664020 [libreoffice-calc] libreoffice-calc: Invisible checkboxes in dialogs
Changed Bug title to 'libreoffice-calc: Invisible checkboxes in dialogs wit
retitle 664020 libreoffice-calc: Invisible checkboxes in dialogs with Raleigh
Gtk Theme
reassign 664020 libreoffice-gtk
thanks
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:48:52PM +0400, Andrey Gusev wrote:
> I tried different gtk theme. Yes, this problem occurs only with
> theme "Raleigh".
> But gtk applicat
15.03.2012 19:46, Rene Engelhard пишет:
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 02:22:53AM +0400, Andrey Gusev wrote:
I wanted to use special paste in calc and found that checkboxes are
invisible. They react on the clicking, but I cannot see checked.
It was version from the testing. I tried the version fro
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libreoffice-l10n-in_3.5.1-1_all.deb: package says section is metapackages,
override says localization.
libreoffice-l10n-za_3.5.1-1_all.deb: package says section is metapackages,
override
Accepted:
fonts-opensymbol_102.2+LibO3.5.1-1_all.deb
to main/libr/libreoffice/fonts-opensymbol_102.2+LibO3.5.1-1_all.deb
libreoffice-base-core_3.5.1-1_amd64.deb
to main/libr/libreoffice/libreoffice-base-core_3.5.1-1_amd64.deb
libreoffice-base_3.5.1-1_amd64.deb
to main/libr/libreoffice/libr
libreoffice_3.5.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libreoffice_3.5.1-1.dsc
libreoffice_3.5.1.orig-binfilter.tar.xz
libreoffice_3.5.1.orig-dictionaries.tar.xz
libreoffice_3.5.1.orig-helpcontent2.tar.xz
libreoffice_3.5.1.orig-src.tar.xz
libreoffice_
That is fine with me personally. This at least is a good start. I
asked politely in my first mail, with respect to people here, trying to
seek for possibility, although was not expecting that kind of response.
If Rene will not package OpenOffice.org anymore (where "OOo" itself
does not e
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 23:59:15 +0800, imacat wrote:
>So you still skip that *funny* part, right?
>
>So, to the list masters, Alexander Wirt and everyone: Are:
>
>* Discrimination against Apache OpenOffice
>
>* Discrimination against Apache OpenOffice's people
>
>* Loosing credibilit
imacat schrieb am Thursday, den 15. March 2012:
> On 2012/03/15 23:25, Rene Engelhard said:
> > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:00:54PM +0800, imacat wrote:
> >> That is very confusing. I remember the Debian list masters said
> >> this list is for OpenOffice and LibreOffice together just *hours ag
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:40:53AM +0800, imacat wrote:
> On 2012/03/15 21:28, imacat said:
> > On 2012/03/15 21:02, Rene Engelhard said:
> >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:42:28PM +0800, imacat wrote:
> >>> my words seriously. There is no Debian policy that people have to
> >>> submit their rea
On 2012/03/15 21:28, imacat said:
> On 2012/03/15 21:02, Rene Engelhard said:
>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:42:28PM +0800, imacat wrote:
>>> my words seriously. There is no Debian policy that people have to
>>> submit their real name in order to be taken seriously. What changed you?
>> Wrong. Mai
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:25:07AM +0800, imacat wrote:
> * Discrimination against Apache OpenOffice
>
> - "The OpenOffice(.org) time in Debian is past. Live with it." when
>
To the Debian list masters, Alexander Wirt and everyone:
Sorry, I forgot to cite the list maintainer's words for prove.
On 2012/03/16 00:04, Rene Engelhard said:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:59:15PM +0800, imacat wrote:
>> * Discrimination against Apache OpenOffice
> I don't. I just point out
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:59:15PM +0800, imacat wrote:
> * Discrimination against Apache OpenOffice
I don't. I just point out that it can't be packaged sanely with
the LibreOffice package still be sane.
> * Discrimination against Apache OpenOffice's people
Nonsense.
> * Loosing credibility as
On 2012/03/15 23:25, Rene Engelhard said:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:00:54PM +0800, imacat wrote:
>> That is very confusing. I remember the Debian list masters said
>> this list is for OpenOffice and LibreOffice together just *hours ago*.
>> Or maybe I am insane?
> Yes, and? That doesn't cha
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 02:22:53AM +0400, Andrey Gusev wrote:
> I wanted to use special paste in calc and found that checkboxes are
> invisible. They react on the clicking, but I cannot see checked.
> It was version from the testing. I tried the version from the sid, but it has
> the same prob
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:07:47PM +0800, imacat wrote:
> On 2012/03/15 22:44, Rene Engelhard said:
> > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:39:01PM +0800, imacat wrote:
> >> On 2012/03/15 22:04, Rene Engelhard said:
> >>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:50:28PM +0800, imacat wrote:
> > I haven't disputed you
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:00:54PM +0800, imacat wrote:
> That is very confusing. I remember the Debian list masters said
> this list is for OpenOffice and LibreOffice together just *hours ago*.
> Or maybe I am insane?
Yes, and? That doesn't change my opinion that OpenOffice in Debian is
Le 15 mars 12 à 15:36, Rene Engelhard a écrit :
Hi,
Hi René,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:34:21PM +0800, imacat wrote:
As the originator of this discussion thread, did I or anyone
mention
EducOO/OOo4Kids? *YOU* did.
Eric did in the thread on apache.
To avoid confusion about wha
The following commit has been merged in the ubuntu-precise-3.5 branch:
commit 1bd3ed3493b1ccc98bf6f867fc712172937c7f10
Merge: 2c77eb4735e3a3116b0160b331a7e16ec2adeae8
e57f76eb376ee7c49b25790e5f5dafadcc4f02c1
Author: Bjoern Michaelsen
Date: Thu Mar 15 14:14:01 2012 +0100
Merge tag 'libreoff
The following commit has been merged in the ubuntu-precise-3.5 branch:
commit 2c77eb4735e3a3116b0160b331a7e16ec2adeae8
Author: Bjoern Michaelsen
Date: Thu Mar 15 12:42:35 2012 +0100
lp#916291: soft fail on registering extensions
diff --git a/libreoffice-common.postinst.in b/libreoffice-com
The following commit has been merged in the ubuntu-precise-3.5 branch:
commit 40ce8ae78c097e2c2c6508ae5c56cecca6c1
Author: Bjoern Michaelsen
Date: Mon Mar 12 15:01:36 2012 +0100
disable debian harden for now
diff --git a/patches/series b/patches/series
index 1583614..60aaed5 100644
---
The following commit has been merged in the ubuntu-precise-3.5 branch:
commit 32b534db788e7d4c8905c60ff6d6277cedf911dd
Author: Bjoern Michaelsen
Date: Mon Mar 12 11:23:21 2012 +0100
also remove applied
fix-nsplugin-to-create-correct-com.sun.star.ucb.Simp.diff
diff --git a/patches/fix-nspl
The following commit has been merged in the ubuntu-precise-3.5 branch:
commit b4f1c1327560a0945f8f57bc0e6465e479a066d1
Author: Bjoern Michaelsen
Date: Thu Mar 15 15:51:20 2012 +0100
update changelog
diff --git a/changelog b/changelog
index 81853f6..9c730dd 100644
--- a/changelog
+++ b/chan
The following commit has been merged in the ubuntu-precise-3.5 branch:
commit 850fc4ce18c392bc845ea5c387f2fb715fbc663c
Author: Bjoern Michaelsen
Date: Tue Mar 6 10:54:01 2012 +0100
reenable libexttextcat
diff --git a/changelog b/changelog
index 7b781ae..a6b2839 100644
--- a/changelog
+++ b
On 2012/03/15 22:44, Rene Engelhard said:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:39:01PM +0800, imacat wrote:
>> On 2012/03/15 22:04, Rene Engelhard said:
>>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:50:28PM +0800, imacat wrote:
> I haven't disputed your right to post here :-)
That is nice to hear that. But
On 2012/03/15 22:36, Rene Engelhard said:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:34:21PM +0800, imacat wrote:
>> * You were making fun of my name.
> Yes, and if you feel better I apologize but still, you should use
> your real name to we can take anything you "submit" as package seriously.
I shall when
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:34:21PM +0800, imacat wrote:
> As the originator of this discussion thread, did I or anyone mention
> EducOO/OOo4Kids? *YOU* did.
Eric did in the thread on apache.
> * You were *ACCUSING* this thread for simple *LIES*.
Where did I lie? And no, I was not accud
On 2012/03/15 21:22, Rene Engelhard said:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:17:09PM +0800, imacat wrote:
>> On 2012/03/15 20:43, Rene Engelhard said:
>>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:33:38PM +0800, imacat wrote:
>>> But in the meanwhile I saw the originating thread on the apache side
>>> which consists al
Le 15 mars 12 à 14:22, Rene Engelhard a écrit :
Hi,
Hi René,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:17:09PM +0800, imacat wrote:
On 2012/03/15 20:43, Rene Engelhard said:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:33:38PM +0800, imacat wrote:
But in the meanwhile I saw the originating thread on the apache side
whi
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 02:22:40PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:17:09PM +0800, imacat wrote:
> > On 2012/03/15 20:43, Rene Engelhard said:
> > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:33:38PM +0800, imacat wrote:
> > > But in the meanwhile I saw the originating thread on the a
On 2012/03/15 21:02, Rene Engelhard said:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:42:28PM +0800, imacat wrote:
>> my words seriously. There is no Debian policy that people have to
>> submit their real name in order to be taken seriously. What changed you?
> Wrong. Maintainer fields have to have real names.
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:17:09PM +0800, imacat wrote:
> On 2012/03/15 20:43, Rene Engelhard said:
> > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:33:38PM +0800, imacat wrote:
> > But in the meanwhile I saw the originating thread on the apache side
> > which consists also of simple lies...
>
> You are ac
On 2012/03/15 21:00, Alexander Wirt said:
> Rene Engelhard schrieb am Thursday, den 15. March 2012:
>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:33:38PM +0800, imacat wrote:
> Nice to meet you. I did not expect to talk to you here directly.
Well, this is the LibreOffice maintainer list. As I am main
On 2012/03/15 20:43, Rene Engelhard said:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:33:38PM +0800, imacat wrote:
> But in the meanwhile I saw the originating thread on the apache side
> which consists also of simple lies...
You are accusing something very seriously. As the originator of
this discussion th
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:42:28PM +0800, imacat wrote:
> my words seriously. There is no Debian policy that people have to
> submit their real name in order to be taken seriously. What changed you?
Wrong. Maintainer fields have to have real names. And as you wanted
to package and "submit"
Rene Engelhard schrieb am Thursday, den 15. March 2012:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:33:38PM +0800, imacat wrote:
> > >> Nice to meet you. I did not expect to talk to you here directly.
> > > Well, this is the LibreOffice maintainer list. As I am maintaining it of
> > > course
> > > I am her
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:33:38PM +0800, imacat wrote:
> >> Nice to meet you. I did not expect to talk to you here directly.
> > Well, this is the LibreOffice maintainer list. As I am maintaining it of
> > course
> > I am here directly :-)
>
> I am posting to "debian-openoffice@lists.deb
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:33:38PM +0800, imacat wrote:
> That's problems we have to solve.
I am interested how. Those package names are mandated by Debian policy
and not changable.
> >> Apache OpenOffice in the foreseeable future. And I believe many people
> >> are, too. I do not hate Libr
On 01.03.15 03:01pm, Rene Engelhard said:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:34:27AM +0800, imacat wrote:
>> On 2012/03/15 11:18, imacat said:
P.S: And I believe that people will take you more serious if you didn'z
post with funny "imarcat" in From but a real name.
>> Actually, nobody ever
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
libreoffice_3.5.1-1.dsc
libreoffice_3.5.1.orig-binfilter.tar.xz
libreoffice_3.5.1.orig-dictionaries.tar.xz
libreoffice_3.5.1.orig-helpcontent2.tar.xz
libreoffice_3.5.1.orig-src.tar.xz
This looks l
On 01.03.15 02:58pm, Rene Engelhard said:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:18:38AM +0800, imacat wrote:
>> On 2012/03/15 07:53, Rene Engelhard said:
>>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 07:39:09AM +0800, imacat wrote:
>> If you must know, I already made Apache OpenOffice different from
>> LibreOffice. See:
The annotated tag, libreoffice_3.5.1-1 has been created
at b9e71fb17f415c68a373b47f2f229d1c8eff64fc (tag)
tagging e57f76eb376ee7c49b25790e5f5dafadcc4f02c1 (commit)
replaces libreoffice_3.5.0-2
tagged by Rene Engelhard
on Tue Mar 13 15:18:12 2012 +0100
- Shortlog
The following commit has been merged in the debian-experimental-3.5 branch:
commit a8f75c90e6a69f0e5bfabbc217dab6f60cd3464f
Author: Rene Engelhard
Date: Tue Mar 13 08:16:59 2012 +
fix up merge; remove @ICONVERSION@ fron .lintian-overrides.in again
diff --git a/libreoffice-base.lintian-
The following commit has been merged in the debian-experimental-3.5 branch:
commit 15b92b216ad691ce9613d59275288930e6987d9c
Author: Rene Engelhard
Date: Tue Mar 13 00:05:48 2012 +0100
release libreoffice 1:3.5.1-1
diff --git a/changelog b/changelog
index e58aca8..b67977e 100644
--- a/chang
The following commit has been merged in the debian-experimental-3.5 branch:
commit e57f76eb376ee7c49b25790e5f5dafadcc4f02c1
Author: Rene Engelhard
Date: Tue Mar 13 14:42:02 2012 +0100
rm *.pyc in solenv/gdb in clean...
diff --git a/rules b/rules
index ae2b48d..756e6b9 100755
--- a/rules
++
The following commit has been merged in the debian-experimental-3.5 branch:
commit 0235e539da605506f48a07f8f322419b3722362d
Author: Rene Engelhard
Date: Tue Mar 13 00:05:21 2012 +0100
remove obsolete no-rcX-in-final.diff
diff --git a/patches/no-rcX-in-final.diff b/patches/no-rcX-in-final.d
The following commit has been merged in the debian-experimental-3.5 branch:
commit e543e933984a482f234b7734824d8d24ce32610a
Author: Rene Engelhard
Date: Mon Mar 12 22:17:23 2012 +0100
prevent .obsolete dir in sax
diff --git a/patches/prevent-sax-obsolete-dir.diff
b/patches/prevent-sax-obs
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:34:27AM +0800, imacat wrote:
> On 2012/03/15 11:18, imacat said:
> >> P.S: And I believe that people will take you more serious if you didn'z
> >> post with funny "imarcat" in From but a real name.
> > P.S. Oh, sorry. If you must know, my real name is Yang Shih-Ching. I
52 matches
Mail list logo
