Hi,
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 04:09:58AM +0200, alex bodnaru wrote:
i'm currently trying libreoffice in order to ensure a best possible release.
Good :)
as i said, the .../user/Scripts contents not migrated to new dir.
my scripts are under .../Scripts/python.
Had a chat about that on Friday
[ you really shouuldn't remove Ccs unless needed, in this case the
Cc to 609...@bugs.debian.org *is* needed as the discussion otherwise
doesn't get recorded ]. Doing now.
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 06:48:08PM +0200, alex bodnaru wrote:
On 01/08/2011 03:12 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Sat,
forwarded 608732 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32939
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 05:21:32AM +0200, alex bodnaru wrote:
as i said, a macro in an extension i'm working at crashes libreoffice.
^
Can you please stop that? You didn't say *anything* before filing this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forwarded 608732 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32939
Bug #608732 [libreoffice] a macro in an extension i'm working at crashes
libreoffice
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32939'.
reassign 586780 hunspell-da,hunspell-fr,hunspell-ne
reassign 505809 hunspell-da,hunspell-fr,hunspell-ne
close 586780 3.3.0-3
forcemerge 505809 505809
thanks
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 07:33:09AM +0200, Gijs Hillenius wrote:
The exact same spelling mistake is prominent in the package
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 586780 hunspell-da,hunspell-fr,hunspell-ne
Bug #586780 [hunspell-da] hunspell-da: spelling error (...) in the title
Bug reassigned from package 'hunspell-da' to
'hunspell-da,hunspell-fr,hunspell-ne'.
reassign 505809
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
notfixed 586780 3.3.0-3
Bug #586780 {Done: Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org}
[hunspell-da,hunspell-fr,hunspell-ne] hunspell-da: spelling error (...) in the
title
There is no source info for the package 'hunspell-da' at version '3.3.0-3' with
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forcemerge 586780 505809
Bug#586780: hunspell-da: spelling error (...) in the title
Bug#505809: Typo in package description: hunpell
Forcibly Merged 505809 586780.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 505809 1:2.4.0-3
Bug #505809 {Done: r...@rene-engelhard.de (Rene Engelhard)}
[hunspell-da,hunspell-fr,hunspell-ne] Typo in package description: hunpell
Bug #586780 {Done: r...@rene-engelhard.de (Rene Engelhard)}
openoffice.org-dictionaries_3.3.0~rc9-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
openoffice.org-dictionaries_3.3.0~rc9-1.dsc
openoffice.org-dictionaries_3.3.0~rc9.orig.tar.gz
openoffice.org-dictionaries_3.3.0~rc9-1.diff.gz
Your message dated Sun, 09 Jan 2011 16:32:45 +
with message-id e1pbycd-0006iw...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#590615: fixed in openoffice.org-dictionaries 1:3.3.0~rc9-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #590615,
regarding Fixes for Serbian hyphen patterns
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sun, 09 Jan 2011 16:32:45 +
with message-id e1pbycd-0006ic...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#607771: fixed in openoffice.org-dictionaries 1:3.3.0~rc9-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #607771,
regarding hunspell-de-de-frami: Please include gedurft
to be marked as
Accepted:
hunspell-da_3.3.0~rc9-1_all.deb
to main/o/openoffice.org-dictionaries/hunspell-da_3.3.0~rc9-1_all.deb
hunspell-de-at-frami_3.3.0~rc9-1_all.deb
to main/o/openoffice.org-dictionaries/hunspell-de-at-frami_3.3.0~rc9-1_all.deb
hunspell-de-ch-frami_3.3.0~rc9-1_all.deb
to
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 03:53:31PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Actually it they got into 3.3, into OOO330_m6, so experimental will have the
fix when I update openoffice.org-dictionaries from 3.2.1 to
libreoffice-dictionaries of 3.3.
Well, I kept openoffice.org-dictionaries (at least for
tag 504221 + moreinfo
thanks
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 02:16:33PM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
I've just fired up my resume in OO for the first time in about a year.
Don't you find it annoying to see !...@#$ near every mainstream
tech. item with pink wavy lines underneath them? Especially for such
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 504221 + moreinfo
Bug #504221 [myspell-en-us] openoffice.org-writer: Default dictionary contents
pathetic.
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
504221:
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 06:20:07PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
OK, LibreOffice now has a technical.dic. I'll not add Tivoli, and what
is Sam and Smit/smitty? But I'll add OpenBSD and FreeBSD (together with
NetBSD which you forgot)
Is it fine for you if we close this bug with that or will
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 504221 - moreinfo
Bug #504221 [myspell-en-us] openoffice.org-writer: Default dictionary contents
pathetic.
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
merge 425791 504221
Bug#425791: myspell-en-us: Please include more technical words
Bug#504221:
tag 504221 - moreinfo
merge 425791 504221
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 10:35:01AM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
OK, LibreOffice now has a technical.dic. I'll not add Tivoli, and what
is Sam and Smit/smitty? But I'll add OpenBSD and FreeBSD (together with
I agree. If IBM wants Tivoli,
Hi,
OK, I am revisting this now that LibreOffice has a technical.dic and
thus close this bug with the next upload of LibreOffice.
Though I'll not add all of your stuff. Let's go over them:
asm
No
chroot
maybei, didn't add yet
dcache
dentry
Too specific imho.
dpkg
gcc
gcj
gij
GPS
revno: 2313
committer: Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org
branch nick: experimental
timestamp: Sun 2011-01-09 20:56:55 +0100
message:
change Homepage: to point to www.libreoffice.org
modified:
changelog
control
control.in
===
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1:3.2.1-11
Severity: wishlist
The set of languages listed in the Tools - Language - For Selection menu in
a brand new document seems to depend on the locale, the UI-language, and
the default language to use for new documents.
It'd be very handy to be able to have
22 matches
Mail list logo
