lightproof is marked for autoremoval from testing
lightproof 1.6-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2019-01-27
It is affected by these RC bugs:
917686: lightproof: FTBFS: "zipfile is empty" with python 3.7 ("Key Error")
Processed: Bug #919298 in libreoffice marked as pending
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #919298 [libreoffice-mysql-connector] libreoffice-mysql-connector: fails to upgrade from sid: dpkg-maintscript-helper errors out Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #919298 to the same tags previously set -- 919298: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919298 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: forcibly merging 919883 919968
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 919883 919968
Bug #919883 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [src:libreoffice] javadoc:
The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the
unnamed module
Bug #919968 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [src:libreoffice] javadoc:
The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the
unnamed module
Merged 919883 919968
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
919883: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919883
919968: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919968
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#919968: marked as done (javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module)
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2019 18:30:36 +0100 with message-id <20190125173036.ge26...@rene-engelhard.de> and subject line Re: Bug#919883: libreoffice arch all FTBFS, javadoc: error - The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5/docs/api/ are in the unnamed module. has caused the Debian Bug report #919968, regarding javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 919968: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919968 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: libreoffice Version: 1:6.1.5~rc1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice=all=1%3A6.1.5~rc1-1=1547977527=0 ... [build BIN] ucbhelper S=/<> && I=$S/instdir && W=$S/workdir && mkdir -p $W/Module/nonl10n/ && touch $W/Module/nonl10n/ucbhelper javadoc: error - The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5/docs/api/ are in the unnamed module. make[2]: *** [/<>/odk/CustomTarget_javadoc.mk:34: /<>/workdir/CustomTarget/odk/docs/java/ref/javadoc_log.txt] Error 1 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1:6.1.5~rc1-1 On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 01:02:33PM +, peter green wrote: >The arch all build for libreoffice 1:6.1.5~rc1-1 ( > > [1]https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice=all=1%3A6.1.5%7Erc1-1=1547977527=0 >) failed with > > > javadoc: error - The code being documented uses modules but the packages > defined in [2]http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5/docs/api/ are in the unnamed > module. Was fixed in above, see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=920331 and https://tracker.debian.org/news/1024343/accepted-libreoffice-1615rc1-2-source-into-unstable/ Regards, Rene--- End Message ---
Processed: oops, wrong bug...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unmerge 920020
Bug #920020 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [src:libreoffice] javadoc:
The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the
unnamed module
Bug #919883 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [src:libreoffice] javadoc:
The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the
unnamed module
Disconnected #920020 from all other report(s).
> reopen 920020
Bug #920020 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [src:libreoffice] javadoc:
The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the
unnamed module
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions 1:6.1.5~rc1-1.
> notfixed 920020 1:6.1.5~rc1-1
Bug #920020 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules
but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #920020 to the same values
previously set
> reassign 920020 openjdk-11-jre-headless
Bug #920020 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules
but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module
Bug reassigned from package 'src:libreoffice' to 'openjdk-11-jre-headless'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #920020 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #920020 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
919883: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919883
920020: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=920020
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed (with 1 error): another reassign for the openjdk bug, correct affects
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # the OpenJDK bug. Not filed against libreoffice. Was reassigned wrongly > # to src:libreoffice > reassign 919895 openjdk-11-jdk-headless Bug #919895 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug reassigned from package 'src:libreoffice' to 'openjdk-11-jdk-headless'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #919895 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #919895 to the same values previously set > tag 919895 + wontfix # based on dokos reassign Unknown tag/s: #, based, on, dokos, reassign. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible help security upstream pending confirmed ipv6 lfs d-i l10n newcomer a11y ftbfs fixed-upstream fixed fixed-in-experimental sid experimental potato woody sarge sarge-ignore etch etch-ignore lenny lenny-ignore squeeze squeeze-ignore wheezy wheezy-ignore jessie jessie-ignore stretch stretch-ignore buster buster-ignore bullseye bullseye-ignore. Bug #919895 [openjdk-11-jdk-headless] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Added tag(s) wontfix. > # remove bogus affects > affects 919798 = Bug #919798 [src:antlr4] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Removed indication that 919798 affects src:java-string-similarity, src:antlr4, src:bsaf, openjdk-11-jdk, src:servlet-api, src:dirgra, src:libgoogle-gson-java, src:jackson-databind, src:jnr-posix, src:libreoffice, src:libcds-moc-java, src:libxml-security-java, src:commons-csv, src:weupnp, src:libparanamer-java, and src:localizer > affects 919800 = Bug #919800 [src:jackson-databind] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Removed indication that 919800 affects src:libcds-moc-java, src:libreoffice, src:jackson-databind, src:libgoogle-gson-java, src:jnr-posix, src:dirgra, src:localizer, src:weupnp, src:libparanamer-java, src:commons-csv, src:libxml-security-java, src:servlet-api, src:bsaf, openjdk-11-jdk, src:antlr4, and src:java-string-similarity > affects 919801 = Bug #919801 [src:libgoogle-gson-java] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Removed indication that 919801 affects src:java-string-similarity, src:bsaf, openjdk-11-jdk, src:antlr4, src:servlet-api, src:commons-csv, src:libxml-security-java, src:libparanamer-java, src:localizer, src:weupnp, src:jackson-databind, src:libgoogle-gson-java, src:jnr-posix, src:dirgra, src:libreoffice, and src:libcds-moc-java > affects 919831 = Bug #919831 [src:libcds-moc-java] libcds-moc-java: FTBFS (The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module) Removed indication that 919831 affects src:servlet-api, src:antlr4, openjdk-11-jdk, src:bsaf, src:java-string-similarity, src:localizer, src:libparanamer-java, src:weupnp, src:libxml-security-java, src:commons-csv, src:libcds-moc-java, src:libreoffice, src:dirgra, src:jackson-databind, src:jnr-posix, and src:libgoogle-gson-java > affects 919874 = Bug #919874 [src:bsaf] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Removed indication that 919874 affects src:jnr-posix, src:jackson-databind, src:libgoogle-gson-java, src:dirgra, src:libcds-moc-java, src:libreoffice, src:commons-csv, src:libxml-security-java, src:weupnp, src:libparanamer-java, src:localizer, src:java-string-similarity, src:servlet-api, openjdk-11-jdk, src:bsaf, and src:antlr4 > affects 919875 = Bug #919875 [src:commons-csv] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Removed indication that 919875 affects src:java-string-similarity, src:antlr4, openjdk-11-jdk, src:bsaf, src:servlet-api, src:dirgra, src:jackson-databind, src:libgoogle-gson-java, src:jnr-posix, src:libreoffice, src:libcds-moc-java, src:libxml-security-java, src:commons-csv, src:localizer, src:libparanamer-java, and src:weupnp > affects 919876 = Bug #919876 [src:java-string-similarity] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Removed indication that 919876 affects src:java-string-similarity, src:servlet-api, src:antlr4, src:bsaf, openjdk-11-jdk, src:dirgra, src:jnr-posix, src:libgoogle-gson-java, src:jackson-databind, src:libcds-moc-java, src:libreoffice, src:libxml-security-java, src:commons-csv, src:libparanamer-java, src:localizer, and src:weupnp > affects 919878 = Bug #919878 [src:servlet-api] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Removed indication that 919878 affects src:java-string-similarity, src:servlet-api, openjdk-11-jdk, src:bsaf, src:antlr4, src:commons-csv,
Bug#920020: marked as done (javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module)
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2019 18:30:36 +0100 with message-id <20190125173036.ge26...@rene-engelhard.de> and subject line Re: Bug#919883: libreoffice arch all FTBFS, javadoc: error - The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5/docs/api/ are in the unnamed module. has caused the Debian Bug report #919883, regarding javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 919883: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919883 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: openjdk-11-jdk Version: 11.0.2+7-1 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: renders package unusable [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:3.0.1:jar (attach-javadocs) on project octopus-rpctunnel: MavenReportException: Error while generating Javadoc: [ERROR] Exit code: 1 - javadoc: error - The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/ are in the unnamed module. The cause for this is: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8212233 The fix is (not tested by myself): http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/8ce4083fc831 via: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8217177 -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.18.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=C (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/lksh Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Versions of packages openjdk-11-jdk depends on: ii libc62.28-5 ii openjdk-11-jdk-headless 11.0.2+7-1 ii openjdk-11-jre 11.0.2+7-1 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.11.dfsg-1 Versions of packages openjdk-11-jdk recommends: pn libxt-dev Versions of packages openjdk-11-jdk suggests: pn openjdk-11-demo pn openjdk-11-source pn visualvm -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1:6.1.5~rc1-1 On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 01:02:33PM +, peter green wrote: >The arch all build for libreoffice 1:6.1.5~rc1-1 ( > > [1]https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice=all=1%3A6.1.5%7Erc1-1=1547977527=0 >) failed with > > > javadoc: error - The code being documented uses modules but the packages > defined in [2]http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5/docs/api/ are in the unnamed > module. Was fixed in above, see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=920331 and https://tracker.debian.org/news/1024343/accepted-libreoffice-1615rc1-2-source-into-unstable/ Regards, Rene--- End Message ---
Bug#919883: marked as done (javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module)
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jan 2019 18:30:36 +0100 with message-id <20190125173036.ge26...@rene-engelhard.de> and subject line Re: Bug#919883: libreoffice arch all FTBFS, javadoc: error - The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5/docs/api/ are in the unnamed module. has caused the Debian Bug report #919883, regarding javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 919883: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919883 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: libreoffice Version: 1:6.1.4-1 Severity: serious The arch all build for libreoffice 1:6.1.5~rc1-1 ( https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice=all=1%3A6.1.5%7Erc1-1=1547977527=0 ) failed with javadoc: error - The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined inhttp://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5/docs/api/ are in the unnamed module. According to the reproducible builds site ( https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rbuild/buster/amd64/libreoffice_6.1.4-4.rbuild.log.gz ) this also affects the existing version in testing 1:6.1.4-1 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1:6.1.5~rc1-1 On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 01:02:33PM +, peter green wrote: >The arch all build for libreoffice 1:6.1.5~rc1-1 ( > > [1]https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice=all=1%3A6.1.5%7Erc1-1=1547977527=0 >) failed with > > > javadoc: error - The code being documented uses modules but the packages > defined in [2]http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5/docs/api/ are in the unnamed > module. Was fixed in above, see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=920331 and https://tracker.debian.org/news/1024343/accepted-libreoffice-1615rc1-2-source-into-unstable/ Regards, Rene--- End Message ---
Processed: tagging 920331
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 920331 - a11y
Bug #920331 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [src:libreoffice]
uninstallable - arch-indep parts missing
Removed tag(s) a11y.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
920331: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=920331
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Processed (with 1 error): openjdk-11 is intential. needs fixing in the packages itself
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unmerge 919800 Bug #919800 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919798 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919801 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919831 [src:libreoffice] libcds-moc-java: FTBFS (The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module) Bug #919874 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919875 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919876 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919878 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919883 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919895 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919968 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #920020 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Disconnected #919800 from all other report(s). > unmerge 919801 Bug #919801 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919798 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919831 [src:libreoffice] libcds-moc-java: FTBFS (The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module) Bug #919874 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919875 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919876 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919878 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919883 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919895 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919968 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #920020 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Disconnected #919801 from all other report(s). > unmerge 919831 Bug #919831 [src:libreoffice] libcds-moc-java: FTBFS (The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module) Bug #919798 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919874 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919875 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919876 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919878 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919883 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919895 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919968 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #920020 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Disconnected #919831 from all other report(s). > unmerge 919874 Bug #919874 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919798 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919875 [src:libreoffice] javadoc: The code being documented
Re: Processed (with 1 error): openjdk-11 is intential. needs fixing in the packages itself
unmerge 919800 unmerge 919801 unmerge 919831 unmerge 919874 unmerge 919875 unmerge 919876 unmerge 919878 unmerge 919883 unmerge 919895 unmerge 919968 unmerge 920020 forcemerge 919883 920020 reassign 919798 src:antlr4 reassign 919800 src:jackson-databind reassign 919801 src:libgoogle-gson-java reassign 919831 src:libcds-moc-java reassign 919874 src:bsaf reassign 919875 src:commons-csv reassign 919876 src:java-string-similarity reassign 919878 src:servlet-api thanks Hi, unmerge doesn't work on multipple bugs. So you accidentially reassigned all of it to libreoffice. Fixing. BTW: Also note libreoffice is already fixed since this morning: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=920331 Regards, Rene
Processed (with 1 error): openjdk-11 is intential. needs fixing in the packages itself
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unmerge 919800 919801 919831 919874 919875 919876 919878 919883 919895 919968 > 920020 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > reassign 919798 src:antlr4 Bug #919798 [openjdk-11-jdk-headless] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919800 [openjdk-11-jdk-headless] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919801 [openjdk-11-jdk-headless] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919831 [openjdk-11-jdk-headless] libcds-moc-java: FTBFS (The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module) Bug #919874 [openjdk-11-jdk-headless] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919875 [openjdk-11-jdk-headless] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919876 [openjdk-11-jdk-headless] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919878 [openjdk-11-jdk-headless] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919883 [openjdk-11-jdk-headless] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919895 [openjdk-11-jdk-headless] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919968 [openjdk-11-jdk-headless] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #920020 [openjdk-11-jdk-headless] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug reassigned from package 'openjdk-11-jdk-headless' to 'src:antlr4'. Bug reassigned from package 'openjdk-11-jdk-headless' to 'src:antlr4'. Bug reassigned from package 'openjdk-11-jdk-headless' to 'src:antlr4'. Bug reassigned from package 'openjdk-11-jdk-headless' to 'src:antlr4'. Bug reassigned from package 'openjdk-11-jdk-headless' to 'src:antlr4'. Bug reassigned from package 'openjdk-11-jdk-headless' to 'src:antlr4'. Bug reassigned from package 'openjdk-11-jdk-headless' to 'src:antlr4'. Bug reassigned from package 'openjdk-11-jdk-headless' to 'src:antlr4'. Bug reassigned from package 'openjdk-11-jdk-headless' to 'src:antlr4'. Bug reassigned from package 'openjdk-11-jdk-headless' to 'src:antlr4'. Bug reassigned from package 'openjdk-11-jdk-headless' to 'src:antlr4'. Bug reassigned from package 'openjdk-11-jdk-headless' to 'src:antlr4'. No longer marked as found in versions openjdk-11/11.0.2+7-1. No longer marked as found in versions openjdk-11/11.0.2+7-1. No longer marked as found in versions openjdk-11/11.0.2+7-1. No longer marked as found in versions openjdk-11/11.0.2+7-1. No longer marked as found in versions openjdk-11/11.0.2+7-1. No longer marked as found in versions openjdk-11/11.0.2+7-1. No longer marked as found in versions openjdk-11/11.0.2+7-1. No longer marked as found in versions openjdk-11/11.0.2+7-1. No longer marked as found in versions openjdk-11/11.0.2+7-1. No longer marked as found in versions openjdk-11/11.0.2+7-1. No longer marked as found in versions openjdk-11/11.0.2+7-1. No longer marked as found in versions openjdk-11/11.0.2+7-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #919798 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #919800 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #919801 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #919831 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #919874 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #919875 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #919876 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #919878 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #919883 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #919895 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #919968 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #920020 to the same values previously set > reassign 919800 src:jackson-databind Bug #919800 [src:antlr4] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919798 [src:antlr4] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in … are in the unnamed module Bug #919801 [src:antlr4] javadoc: The code being documented uses modules but the packages defined in …
LibreOffice in Sid
Hi, Had some trouble with LibreOffice in Debian Sid. The updates were held back. Removed LibreOffice and tried to reinstall it again, but that failed, in Synaptic and in Terminal, Terminal output for "apt-get install libreoffice": Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libreoffice : Depends: libreoffice-base but it is not going to be installed Depends: libreoffice-calc but it is not going to be installed Depends: libreoffice-core (= 1:6.1.5~rc1-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libreoffice-draw but it is not going to be installed Depends: libreoffice-impress but it is not going to be installed Depends: libreoffice-math but it is not going to be installed Depends: libreoffice-report-builder-bin but it is not going to be installed Depends: libreoffice-writer but it is not going to be installed Depends: libreoffice-avmedia-backend-gstreamer but it is not going to be installed or libreoffice-avmedia-backend-vlc but it is not going to be installed Depends: python3-uno (>= 4.4.0~beta2) but it is not going to be installed Recommends: libreoffice-librelogo but it is not going to be installed Recommends: libreoffice-nlpsolver but it is not going to be installed Recommends: libreoffice-report-builder but it is not going to be installed Recommends: libreoffice-script-provider-bsh but it is not going to be installed Recommends: libreoffice-script-provider-js but it is not going to be installed Recommends: libreoffice-script-provider-python but it is not going to be installed Recommends: libreoffice-sdbc-postgresql but it is not going to be installed Recommends: libreoffice-wiki-publisher but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. Finally, I went to https://www.libreoffice.org/download/download/ downloaded and installed libreoffice6.1 that way without any trouble, because I really need LibreOffice. This mail to notify you there is or was a problem with LibreOffice in Sid. No problems in Stretch though ( wich I use on another computer ) only in Sid it had this behavior. Cheers, Peter Braet
Re: LibreOffice in Sid
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:13:16AM +0100, peterbr...@posteo.net wrote: > Had some trouble with LibreOffice in Debian Sid. The updates were held back. > Removed LibreOffice and tried to reinstall it again, but that failed, in > Synaptic and in Terminal, Terminal output for "apt-get install libreoffice": > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > or been moved out of Incoming. The build of some packages of libreoffice failed, so apt can't properly figure out what to do in that situation when only some of them are available to be installed. It's a temporary problem, that has been fixed earlier today (which means you'd see the effects this evening or tomorrow). https://bugs.debian.org/920331 That said, I wholeheartedly recommend you to not use sid if you can't deal with this kind of situations that tend to happen every so often in a development distribution like debian unstable/sid. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
