Re: libreoffice, mingw-w64, gcc-mingw-w64 and gnat-4.6 on armhf

2012-02-26 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 02:16:09PM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: # file /usr/share/libreoffice/sdk/classes/win/unowinreg.dll /usr/share/libreoffice/sdk/classes/win/unowinreg.dll: PE32 executable (DLL) (console) Intel 80386 (stripped to external PDB), for MS Windows

Re: libreoffice, mingw-w64, gcc-mingw-w64 and gnat-4.6 on armhf

2012-02-25 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org wrote: Hi Peter, On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 02:36:17AM +, peter green wrote: Libreoffice hasn't yet been built on armhf. I consider libreoffice to be a reasonablly important package and one that we need to get in before we can claim

Re: libreoffice, mingw-w64, gcc-mingw-w64 and gnat-4.6 on armhf

2012-02-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 01:49:02PM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: it's even more hilarious than that: it's actually because java can't access windows registry functions, so someone wrote a c-based DLL which java *can* bind to. the fact that the end-result of the Yes, that is

Re: libreoffice, mingw-w64, gcc-mingw-w64 and gnat-4.6 on armhf

2012-02-25 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org wrote: Hi, On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 01:49:02PM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:  it's even more hilarious than that: it's actually because java can't access windows registry functions, so someone wrote a c-based DLL

Re: libreoffice, mingw-w64, gcc-mingw-w64 and gnat-4.6 on armhf

2012-02-25 Thread peter green
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: i686-w64-mingw32-g++ is called. that's different from mingw-w64, then. No it's *part of* mingw-w64. Mnigw-w64 is a fork of mingw32 and provides toolchains targetting both 32-bit and 64-bit windows. These toolchains (at least in debian, not sure

Re: libreoffice, mingw-w64, gcc-mingw-w64 and gnat-4.6 on armhf

2012-02-03 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Libreoffice hasn't yet been built on armhf. I consider libreoffice to be a reasonablly important package and one that we need to get in before we can claim we have a reasonablly complete port. And the segfault described on

libreoffice, mingw-w64, gcc-mingw-w64 and gnat-4.6 on armhf

2012-02-02 Thread peter green
Libreoffice hasn't yet been built on armhf. I consider libreoffice to be a reasonablly important package and one that we need to get in before we can claim we have a reasonablly complete port. The reason libreoffice isn't built is because mingw-w64 is not installable. The reason mingw-w64 is

Re: libreoffice, mingw-w64, gcc-mingw-w64 and gnat-4.6 on armhf

2012-02-02 Thread Stephen Kitt
Hi Peter, On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 02:36:17AM +, peter green wrote: Libreoffice hasn't yet been built on armhf. I consider libreoffice to be a reasonablly important package and one that we need to get in before we can claim we have a reasonablly complete port. [...] This