On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 19:50 -0500, David A. Cobb wrote:
Bruce Byfield wrote:
Hi:
I'm working on an article about the decision to use Java in
OpenOffice.org. The article will include both positive and negative
opinions, and talk about how it affects repackagers of OOo, and how they
Hi,
David A. Cobb wrote:
I guess I need to start with, Is anyone here awake? I see that
No, the question here is where you were the last months. If you would have
been here (or using Debian sarge/sid) you would have seen that there were
regular openoffice.org updates for sarge and sid and
Hi,
Bruce Byfield wrote:
If possible, I'd like to get a quote about how Debian plans to respond.
By putting together a Java-free package? By using a free implementation
This is what we currently do for 1.1.x.
of Java? By some other means? Since Debian is a distribution that is
That's
[CC:ing debain-openoffice, may be interessant for others, too ]
Hi,
Alex Perry wrote:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice/2004/07/msg00216.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice/2004/07/msg00227.html
This exchange was six months ago, and I can't find anything more recent
Update of /cvs/debian-openoffice/oo-debian-files/debian
In directory gluck:/tmp/cvs-serv11515/debian
Modified Files:
changelog
Log Message:
minor TODO update
Index: changelog
===
RCS file:
Update of /cvs/debian-openoffice/oo-debian-files/doc
In directory gluck:/tmp/cvs-serv11515/doc
Modified Files:
TODO
Log Message:
minor TODO update
Index: TODO
===
RCS file: /cvs/debian-openoffice/oo-debian-files/doc/TODO,v
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
David A. Cobb wrote:
I guess I need to start with, Is anyone here awake? I see that
No, the question here is where you were the last months.
OK. Any of the months from June 2004 through February 2005, mostly
trying to get a stable and working Debian
Hi,
David A. Cobb wrote:
I only discovered the page and the working group by way of the
back-door. That is, through the OpenOffice.org page on Installing for
Linux. As it is, I would not have read that except for the 2.0 _beta_
announcement -- I already had both a 1.1.2, and a 1.9.79
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
David A. Cobb wrote:
I only discovered the page and the working group by way of the
back-door. That is, through the OpenOffice.org page on Installing for
Linux. As it is, I would not have read that except for the 2.0 _beta_
announcement -- I already had both a
Anders Breindahl wrote:
P. S.: Bruce, would you post a link to me, when you're done with your article?
I'll write to the debian-openoffice list when it appears.
However, in case I forget, the article is being done for Newsforge, and
I plan on finishing it within the week. That probably means that
Rene Engelhard wrote:
This is my comment. Probably not suitable for a official quote but the
comment of one of the two maintainers.
Would you mind being quoted, or at least cited as the source? Your
comments will be a good example of the problems that the situation causes.
To put it mildly, it
11 matches
Mail list logo
