which causes libreoffice to become BD-Uninstallable.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
> On Jun 19, 2020, at 9:53 AM, r...@rene-engelhard.de wrote:
>
> severity 963109 wishlist
> tag 963109 + wontfix
> thanks
>
> Am 19. Juni 2020 08:24:57 MESZ schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> :
>> I just noticed that src:libreoffice 7.x has added a build depen
On 6/19/20 10:08 AM, r...@rene-engelhard.de wrote:
> Am 19. Juni 2020 09:58:34 MESZ schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> :
>
>> clang isn’t required to build libreoffice [1], it’s just recommend.
>
> I know. That is even documented:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/l
On 6/19/20 1:08 PM, r...@rene-engelhard.de wrote:
> Am 19. Juni 2020 12:52:40 MESZ schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> :
>> So nothing that keeps us from using GCC in cases where clang is not
>> available.
>
> Correct. Except staying as close as possible with upstream.
very simple and modest change and your only answer
is to turn this into such a long pointless discussion basically telling me I
shouldn't be doing what I'm doing.
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `'
d upstream. This way, other distributions like Fedora and openSUSE
will profit
from your efforts as well.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Control: tags -1 +patch
Hi!
Attaching a patch which modifies debian/rules accordingly so that the build
dependencies
are corrected after running "debian/rules debian/control".
Please consider including it for the next upload.
Thanks a lot!
Adrian
--
.''`. John
Hi!
On 1/11/23 19:45, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Attaching a patch which modifies debian/rules accordingly so that the build
dependencies
are corrected after running "debian/rules debian/control".
Please consider including it for the next upload.
Oops, I just realized I for
684/
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Description: Fix incorrect parameter type to std::min() on
x27;s probably a good idea to check other instances of "findstring" in
debian/rules
and make sure it does not match on undesired substrings.
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
On 1/4/20 10:19 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I haven't verified it, but my suspicion is that the following conditional
> test is
> incorrect as the function findstring will match "ppc64" in OOO_NOGUI_ARCHS if
> it contains "ppc64el":
&g
nditional to
test for the presence of a specific **substring** in a given string. "
Emphasis mine.
You want to use "filter" when looking for architectures, not "findstring"
which will match "ppc64" in "ppc64el".
Adrian
> [1] https://www.gnu.org/softwar
; is
not, because the latter matches substrings and hence will match
architectures that you didn't mean to match. That's my point.
And I think it's probably a good idea to check all occurrences
of "findstring" in debian/rules to make sure that it really
matches the strings
On 1/4/20 3:25 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 03:15:02PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Feel free to do the same for powerpc as the build machine
>> for ppc64 and powerpc is the same and the new one for
>> both architectures will be even faster
14 matches
Mail list logo
