are available on http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2007/07/03/
Thank you,
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On 02/01/08 at 13:39 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
tag 458541 + pending
thanks
Hi,
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I was trying to reproduce bug #431592 (openoffice.org: fails to build
with num-cpus1), and I noticed that openoffice.org fails to build even
when num-cpus=1 now.
Here
welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment. Internet was not accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas
processing:
openoffice.org-hyphenation-en-us
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
It is reproducible by installing your package in a clean chroot - cleaned
up using:
debfoster -o MaxPriority=required -o UseRecommends=no -f -n apt debfoster
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL
systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
need at least db 4.1
make[1]: *** [stamp/build] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/openoffice.org-3.1.1/ooo-build'
make: *** [debian/stampdir/build] Error 2
Does it ring a bell?
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr
: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-openoffice-requ
at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net
on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Source: libreoffice
Version: 1:3.4.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120331 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
x86_64-linux-gnu-g++
Source: hyphen
Version: 2.8.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120419 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering directory
Source: libreoffice
Version: 1:3.5.3-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120524 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules build
Source: graphite2
Version: 1.3.9-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170111 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]:
Source: lightproof
Version: 1.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20181229 ftbfs-buster
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> for oxt
Source: libixion
Version: 0.15.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200225 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by building only architecture:any binary
Source: libixion
Version: 0.15.0-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx2.4
Hi,
libixion fails to build with Sphinx 2.4, currently available in
experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> cd doc && \
Source: liborcus
Version: 0.15.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200709 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[6]: Entering directory
Source: libixion
Version: 0.15.0-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx3.1
Hi,
libixion fails to build with Sphinx 3.1, currently available in
experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
> cd doc && \
Source: libfreehand
Version: 0.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200620 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash ../../libtool
Source: liblangtag
Version: 0.6.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20210120 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..
Hi,
On 10/11/21 at 10:05 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 9. November 2021 22:28:18 MEZ schrieb Lucas Nussbaum :
> >Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in
> >debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9,
On 10/11/21 at 11:10 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
>
> Am 10. November 2021 10:55:31 MEZ schrieb Lucas Nussbaum :
> >Hi,
> >
> >On 10/11/21 at 10:05 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Am 9. November 2021 22:28:18 MEZ schrie
Source: python-ooolib
Version: 0.0.22-5
Severity: important
Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9
Tags: bookworm sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep
Dear maintainer,
Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in
debian/rules. This
Source: myspell
Version: 1:3.0+pre3.1-24.2
Severity: important
Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9
Tags: bookworm sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep
Dear maintainer,
Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in
debian/rules.
Source: mythes
Version: 2:1.2.4-3
Severity: important
Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9
Tags: bookworm sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep
Dear maintainer,
Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in
debian/rules. This is
On 03/11/21 at 17:13 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 03.11.21 um 08:05 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> > If it's truly a random failure, it might be better to downgrade it but
> > keep it open,
> I don't really like this. I don't like open bugs which definitely wi
Hi,
On 02/11/21 at 17:51 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 07:18:19PM +0200 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> > And interestingly, (after rm'ing the stale unopkg lockfile..) it passed.
> >
> > Also after a new attempt with manual
> >
> > $ make clean && make subsequencheck
Source: libreoffice
Version: 1:7.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211023 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]:
Source: python-ooolib
Version: 0.0.22-5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: bookworm sid
Usertags: format1.0 format1.0-nkp-nv
Dear maintainer,
This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in
bookworm. Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many
advantages,
Source: hsqldb1.8.0
Version: 1.8.0.10+dfsg-11
Severity: wishlist
Tags: bookworm sid
Usertags: format1.0 format1.0-kp-nv
Dear maintainer,
This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in
bookworm. Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many
Hi,
Please also see
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00096.html , where it
was noticed that the conversion for this package is trivial, and builds
bit-by-bit identical binary packages.
Lucas
Source: graphite2
Version: 1.3.14-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230925 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Entering
Source: libixion
Version: 0.17.0-3
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-binary-20230816 ftbfs-binary-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild
Hi,
This package fails to do build a binary-only build (not source) after a
Source: libreoffice
Version: 1:7.3.5~rc2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: lightproof
Version: 1.6-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20230217 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (bookworm), your package failed
to build on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: libixion
Version: 0.17.0-3
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-sab-20230813 ftbfs-source-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild
Hi,
This package fails to build a source package after a successful build
37 matches
Mail list logo
