[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott Ellis) wrote on 19.12.97 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
And the instant someone provides us with free software equivilant to ssh
or pgp, we'll move to use it. We need the functionality, unfortunatly
sometimes you have to use what you can get.
You _do_ know that there's a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hamish Moffatt) wrote on 20.12.97 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
of non-official sites. Does dpkg check the MD5sum with
the one in the Packages file or in the archive itself?
I think dpkg-mountable does. At least it always tells me which packages
pass a MD5 check before even
[CC'ing debian-policy]
Jim == Jim Pick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[I wrote]
Yes, it is discussed in the Debian Packaging Manual, section 12.
See: /usr/doc/dpkg/packaging.html/ch-sharedlibs.html
You should just go ahead and file bugs against packages which don't
include the .so link as part
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Kai, the discussion already ended (I think), but now that you ask, I
would like to answer:
Policy says so because they are useful to modify. What is so hard to
understand about this?
I failed to see why some people can say they are *all* useful to modify
On Sun, Dec 21 1997 13:33 +0200 Kai Henningsen writes:
You _do_ know that there's a free PGP version, right? (The u[i[n]]
series.) See the international PGP home page. It's derived from very early
PGP versions that were still free. Incidentally, the guy who did the last
hacks on it lives
5 matches
Mail list logo
