So what's the problem with something like
case `id -u` in
0) # whatever we want for root
;;
*) # whatever we want for everybody else
;;
esac
?
Answer: The attitude described by the phrase whatever WE want for (whoever)
Howbout: We have scripts in a dir like /etc/bash/scripts in which
If an Essential package depends on other packages, shouldn't those other
packages be tagged Essential as well?
Currently, gzip (Essential) depends on debianutils (non-Essential).
--
Enrique Zanardi[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dpto. Fisica Fundamental y
On Fri, Mar 06, 1998 at 05:11:08PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Fri, 6 Mar 1998, Enrique Zanardi wrote:
If an Essential package depends on other packages, shouldn't those other
packages be tagged Essential as well?
Currently, gzip (Essential) depends on debianutils (non-Essential).
I propose the following policy:
No package shall create without approval any command name (or
corresponding manpage):
1. not matching the regexp ^[a-z0-9]..
2. matching ^... if it creates more than two such
3. matching [^-+._,a-z0-9], or
4. which is a single common dictionary word
Do
Package: lintian
Version: 0.3.0
E: e2fslibsg-dev: symlink-should-be-absolute usr/lib/libe2p.so
../../lib/libe2p.so.2.3
N:
N: Symbolic links into /etc or /var should be absolute.
N:
N: Refer to Policy Manual, section 3.3.5 for details.
N:
Neither the policy nor the packaging manual do say
Hello
I think we should make a new policy:
All pixmaps and bitmaps are locate under
/usr/X11R6/include/X11/[pixmaps|bitmaps].
The idea is that the config of all the window-manager und other
programs with icons, use the same place. The result is, that the
user don't have to search for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Fri, 6 Mar 1998, Yann Dirson wrote:
Package: lintian
Version: 0.3.0
E: e2fslibsg-dev: symlink-should-be-absolute usr/lib/libe2p.so
../../lib/libe2p.so.2.3
N:
N: Symbolic links into /etc or /var should be absolute.
N:
N: Refer to Policy Manual,
7 matches
Mail list logo
