Previously Manoj Srivastava wrote:
What do the rest of you think? Is this a policy document?
I agree with Adam that it's purely documentation, not part of the policy.
Wichert.
--
==
This combination of bytes
Hi,
Wichert == Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Wichert I agree with Adam that it's purely documentation, not part
Wichert of the policy.
Do you not find the version numbers suggestive?
debian-policy_2.4.1.3.deb
developers-reference_2.4.1.3.deb
On 4 Sep 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Santiago But the reason policy says some files should not be
Santiago conffiles is the following: Doing this will lead to dpkg
Santiago giving the user confusing and possibly dangerous options
Santiago for conffile update when the package is
On 5 Sep 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Do you not find the version numbers suggestive?
debian-policy_2.4.1.3.deb
developers-reference_2.4.1.3.deb
packaging-manual_2.4.1.1.deb
Would there be serious objections to having the policy
maintainers actually take
Manoj writes:
Would there be serious objections to having the policy maintainers
actually take over the developers reference?
I think it's an excellent idea, if you will bring it up to date and keep it
there. That's more important than classifying it as documentation or
policy.
If needed, we
Some time around 04 Sep 1998 10:09:23 CDT,
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
So, what is the status of the Programmer's manual?
It has been renamed to packaging manual a long time ago.
--
Proudly running Debian Linux! Linux vs. Windows is a no-Win situation
Igor Grobman
6 matches
Mail list logo
