Peter Palfrader [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 01 Apr 2001, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Hi Taral!
You wrote:
It should most certainly be debian/rulz, not rulez.
Why not make it d3b1an/rulz, then?
d3b14n/ru|z seems like a good choice.
No, no. d3b!4n/ru|z is much clearer.
Julian == Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Julian On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 03:50:39PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
policy uses alphanumeric to define version numbers. Is this only a-zA-Z0-9,
or does this include the _? As the _ is used as a seperator in Debian
package file names,
Adam == Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PWD=`pwd`
Adam Btw, I think this is bad. They should use CURDIR.
__ echo $CURDIR
__
So, what is the provenance of this CURDIR variable? Has it
been blessed by POSIX? indeed not. However, I see that both $PWD and
the pwd utility are
* Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010402 01:32]:
On 20010402T030737-0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
So, what is the provenance of this CURDIR variable? Has it
been blessed by POSIX? indeed not.
I believe this is irrelevant, as portable make is next to useless.
I'll admit I
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 12:45:54AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
It should most certainly be debian/rulz, not rulez.
Why not make it d3b1an/rulz, then?
d3b14n/ru|z seems like a good choice.
Although the | could cause fun were someone to forget to quote it ;-)
Yeah, but we won't
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 03:07:37AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
PWD=`pwd`
Adam Btw, I think this is bad. They should use CURDIR.
__ echo $CURDIR
__
So, what is the provenance of this CURDIR variable? Has it
been blessed by POSIX? indeed not. However, I see that both $PWD
Your message dated 02 Apr 2001 08:52:25 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line [PROPOSAL] renaming of debian/rules file
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 03:01:42AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Julian == Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Julian On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 03:50:39PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
policy uses alphanumeric to define version numbers. Is this only
a-zA-Z0-9,
or does this include
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.2.0
Severity: normal
The Debian policy specifies (10.3.1) that maintainer scripts should not
assume whether or not a specific implementation of the handling of
init scripts is used.
It provides a tool, update-rc.d, that has to be used to install or
remove an
On Mon, 02 Apr 2001, Jean-Philippe Guérard wrote:
The Debian policy specifies (10.3.1) that maintainer scripts should not
assume whether or not a specific implementation of the handling of
init scripts is used.
It provides a tool, update-rc.d, that has to be used to install or
remove an
On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 08:50:30AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
Manoj == Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Manoj So, what is the provenance of this CURDIR variable? Has it
Manoj been blessed by POSIX? indeed not. However, I see that both $PWD and
Manoj the pwd utility
Here's the last installment of my comments on the existing policy
document
11.2, describing .la files:
[they] contain a lot of useful info ... (e.g. dependency
libraries for static linking)
Would dependency information be better?
11.2, penultimate paragraph reads:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 42052 [ACCEPTED 2/4/01] /var/mail and /var/spool/mail
Bug#42052: [OLD PROPOSAL] /var/mail and /var/spool/mail
Changed Bug title.
severity 42052 normal
Bug#42052: [ACCEPTED 2/4/01] /var/mail and /var/spool/mail
Severity set to `normal'.
On Apr 02, Julian Gilbey wrote:
11.9 Statically allocated ids:
If you need a statically allocated id, you must ask for a user or
group id from the base system maintainer, and must not release
the package until you have been allocated one. Once you have
been allocated
Le 2001-04-02 14:35:06 -0300, Henrique M Holschuh écrivait :
On Mon, 02 Apr 2001, Jean-Philippe Guérard wrote:
However, it does not provide a standard way to check the current
status of an init script.
Please verify if invoke-rc.d --query (initscript) (action) in the accepted
proposal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 90992 debian-policy
Bug#90992: Relationship fields aren't allowed to be multiline
Bug reassigned from package `lintian' to `debian-policy'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
16 matches
Mail list logo
