Re: 7.5.1 Overwriting files in other packages

2001-05-13 Thread Seth Arnold
* Karl M. Hegbloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010512 20:24]: Is this always true? 7.5.1 Overwriting files in other packages Firstly, as mentioned before, it is usually an error for a package to contain files which are on the system in another package, though currently the --force-overwrite

Re: 7.5.1 Overwriting files in other packages

2001-05-13 Thread Brian May
Seth == Seth Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Seth And, as far as I can tell, yes, it is always true that Seth usually it is an error for two packages to contain duplicate Seth files when both can be installed on a system. Except for when the package uses the Replaces: header... --

Re: Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering gone?

2001-05-13 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 01:13:50PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: I'm not talking about editing config files here. I'm more interested in programs that invoke /usr/bin/editor. Well, see Policy section 12.4. Editors and pagers. Your point being? Okay, I'll try this step by step. : That

Re: Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering gone?

2001-05-13 Thread Herbert Xu
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 01:54:08PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: That is, ae, which is required. In another place, Policy says: `required' packages are necessary for the proper functioning of the system. You must not remove these packages or your system may

Re: Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering gone?

2001-05-13 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 10:25:15PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: That is, ae, which is required. In another place, Policy says: `required' packages are necessary for the proper functioning of the system. You must not remove these packages or your system may

Re: Finishing the FHS transition

2001-05-13 Thread Colin Watson
Chris Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 07:31:43PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: - A change in the policy to remove the obsolete /usr/doc symlinks. This is supposed to happen once enough packages make the transition. Now, if we're really down to 253 packages that use /usr/doc

Bug#32263: Proposal: Splitting cgi-bin

2001-05-13 Thread Brian White
Now that we're getting ready for a new release, I'd like to implement this new policy in the new development stream. Here is the text I plan to include in the necessary bug reports I'll submit. I don't forsee any difficulties with the upgrade path. Please let me know if you think I missed

Bug#32263: Proposal: Splitting cgi-bin

2001-05-13 Thread Peter Palfrader
Hi Brian! On Sun, 13 May 2001, Brian White wrote: There is new Debian policy regarding the use of cgi-bin in web servers. The basic issue is that many webmasters expect to have this directory available for their own use and not have it taken over by the system to be used by the various

Re: Use of Debian offical logo

2001-05-13 Thread Colin Watson
Hisham Ismail [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm just a plain Debian fan and I like to print t-shirts for myself and my collegues with debian official logo on it. These t-shirts are not mean for sale. Is it possible?. There's no problem at all with using the open use logo in that way. The official use

Re: Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering gone?

2001-05-13 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A solution would be some sort of an essential virtual package that editors would provide, but that's not viable, either. So we're stuck. :) Why is that not viable? Do the following: * Make all the different editor packages provide the virtual package

Re: Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering gone?

2001-05-13 Thread Herbert Xu
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 12:38:05PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: * Create a real package editor-proxy, which depends on editor, and is marked Essential. You don't even have to do that. Just make base-files depend on it. It already depends on awk anyway. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is

Re: Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering gone?

2001-05-13 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 12:38:05PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: A solution would be some sort of an essential virtual package that editors would provide, but that's not viable, either. So we're stuck. :) Why is that not viable? Do the following: * Make all the different editor

Re: Defaults for satisfying dependencies - ordering gone?

2001-05-13 Thread Herbert Xu
Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 12:38:05PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: Why is that not viable? Do the following: * Make all the different editor packages provide the virtual package editor. * Create a real package editor-proxy, which depends on

Re: 7.5.1 Overwriting files in other packages

2001-05-13 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 08:19:05PM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote: Is this always true? 7.5.1 Overwriting files in other packages Firstly, as mentioned before, it is usually an error for a package to contain files which are on the system in another package, though currently the

Re: 7.5.1 Overwriting files in other packages

2001-05-13 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Julian Gilbey wrote: The CVS version no longer has the part though currently ... as this is not currently true. That default will never change in the dpkg code anymore as well, instead the installer will have to put that in /etc/dpkg/dpkg.cfg. Wichert. --