You are the release manager. File the bugs, declare them
release critical [...]
Anthony Towns wrote:
Okay. Whatever. I really don't have the patience for -policy anymore.
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 10:17:48PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
You know, neither do I. Manoj, have fun waiting until
On Sun, 20 May 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
You are the release manager. File the bugs, declare them
release critical [...]
Okay. Whatever. I really don't have the patience for -policy anymore.
I agree with Manoj on this. task packages exist potato and woody. That means
we have to
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 11:55:21AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On Sun, 20 May 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
You are the release manager. File the bugs, declare them
release critical [...]
Okay. Whatever. I really don't have the patience for -policy anymore.
I agree with Manoj on this. task
On Mon, 21 May 2001 18:04:42 +1000
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 11:55:21AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
Upgrading from potato to woody and beyond works fine, nothing breaks,
you merely don't get your tasks to upgrade cleanly by simply using apt.
Isn't that
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 01:10:41AM -0700, Alexander Hvostov wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 11:55:21AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
Upgrading from potato to woody and beyond works fine, nothing breaks,
you merely don't get your tasks to upgrade cleanly by simply using apt.
Isn't that generally
Joey == Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joey Anthony Towns wrote:
You are the release manager. File the bugs, declare them
release critical [...]
Okay. Whatever. I really don't have the patience for -policy anymore.
Joey You know, neither do I.
Ah. The Things aren't
Raul == Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Raul That's what change logs are for. Perhaps there should be a
Raul release-oriented changelog?
Raul It does seem reasonable that we should have some sort of
Raul queuing mechanism to park proposed policy changes as they're
Raul tried out, but
! The standard shell interpreter `tt/bin/sh/tt' is a
! symbolic link to a POSIX compatible shell. Since the POSIX
! standard for shells leaves important areas unspecified,
! wherever it is lacking, `tt/bin/sh/tt' shall follow the
! emconsensus behavior/em of
On 19.V.2001 at 11:27 Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For example what display manager we will choose: gdm, kdm, wdm or xdm?
Maybe gdm, because it provides session menu, but it looks to me a little
buggy. I'm giving this only as an example. Surely
Anand Kumria [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate scripsit:
I would like to propose ladspa-host and ladspa-plugin as names of virtual
packages which
ladspa-host: application capable of using ladspa-plugins to process audio
data
ladspa-plugin: provides plug-in libraries in accordance to
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 12:34:48AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Anand Kumria [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate scripsit:
I would like to propose ladspa-host and ladspa-plugin as names of virtual
packages which
ladspa-host: application capable of using ladspa-plugins to process audio
Anand Kumria [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate scripsit:
Well, to elaborate a bit more, a ladspa plugin package would not depend on
any shared library, or sometimes libc/libm. But that would not be a very
informative dependency information. Such a package would usually be
useful only when
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.5.4.0
Severity: wishlist
There is a bit of a glaring bug in policy. An earlier attempt to
address this was made in #60461, but it seems like people found that
one confusing, and there has been no progress on it. This proposal is
intended to supersede #60461,
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 11:43:08AM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
--- debian-policy.sgml~ Mon May 21 10:45:51 2001
+++ debian-policy.sgmlMon May 21 10:54:35 2001
@@ -3982,8 +3982,8 @@
headingLinux File system Structure/heading
p
- The location of all
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 06:04:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Please go back and reread the thread about this immediately after
potato's release: the problem with tasks as they existed for potato
was that they make it very hard to cope with RC bugs in packages in
a task. If any one package
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Chris Waters wrote:
Something more like ``The location of all installed files and directories
must comply with the Linux Filesystem Hierarchy Standard, except where
indicated otherwise (or where it's just plain stupid).''
Perfect. Let's do it!
(I might suggest
16 matches
Mail list logo
