Re: conffiles in /etc/default

2001-06-18 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 05:36:34PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: Does this change have a rationale (and if so, could it be included in a footnote), or should it be reverted? The file is expected to be changed, which would trigger the 'get the new version?' prompt. Trying to reduce

Re: conffiles in /etc/default

2001-06-18 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 12:13:58PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 05:36:34PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: Does this change have a rationale (and if so, could it be included in a footnote), or should it be reverted? The file is expected to be changed, which would

Re: conffiles in /etc/default

2001-06-18 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 10:44:24AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 12:13:58PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: All conffiles are expected to be changed... From 11.7.3: The easy way to achieve this behavior is to make the configuration file a `conffile'. This is

Re: conffiles in /etc/default

2001-06-18 Thread Joey Hess
Julian Gilbey wrote: On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 05:36:34PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: Does this change have a rationale (and if so, could it be included in a footnote), or should it be reverted? The file is expected to be changed, which would trigger the 'get the new

gnome-libs-data: /etc/mime-magic.dat

2001-06-18 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Can a file that is not human readable (editable) be a conffile? gnome-libs-data declares /etc/mime-magic.dat (which is some kind of binary database generated from the textual conffile /etc/mime-magic) as such. The maintainer thinks this is correct -- I obviously don't. I'm bringing this up on

Re: conffiles in /etc/default

2001-06-18 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 11:37:03AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: From 11.7.3: The easy way to achieve this behavior is to make the configuration file a `conffile'. This is appropriate only if it is possible to distribute a default version that will work for most installations,

Re: gnome-libs-data: /etc/mime-magic.dat

2001-06-18 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 11:57:16PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: Can a file that is not human readable (editable) be a conffile? gnome-libs-data declares /etc/mime-magic.dat (which is some kind of binary database generated from the textual conffile /etc/mime-magic) as such. The maintainer

Re: conffiles in /etc/default

2001-06-18 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 02:31:47PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Well I don't know about you, but most of the files in /etc/default on my system do not need to be changed. They're all sensible defaults. They're certianly no more likely to be changed than random other conffiles in /etc (with the

CVS jdg: * Correct the /etc/default conffile/config file stuff I mucked up

2001-06-18 Thread debian-policy
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy Module name:debian-policy Changes by: jdg Mon Jun 18 16:18:37 PDT 2001 Modified files: . : policy.sgml Log message: * Correct the /etc/default conffile/config file stuff I mucked up (sorry Joey!) [10.3.2]

CVS jdg: * And make a note of the /etc/default stuff in the changelog too.

2001-06-18 Thread debian-policy
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy Module name:debian-policy Changes by: jdg Mon Jun 18 16:21:10 PDT 2001 Modified files: debian : changelog Log message: * And make a note of the /etc/default stuff in the changelog too.

Re: Bug#101127: gnome-libs-data: /etc/mime-magic.dat

2001-06-18 Thread Christian Marillat
JG == Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] JG Can I check if I've understood correctly. What happens if I edit JG /etc/mime-magic; does /etc/mime-magic.dat get automatically recreated JG or do things break if I don't update it manually? And how do I do the JG latter? This file isn't