On Sat, 1 Sep 2001, Jakob B. Jensen wrote:
Suppose package X is licensed under GPL version 1 or later.
As long as this text remains on the package, each recipient has
the freedom to use it *at his/hers option* under GPL 1, 2 or 3
(or later).
Suppose by an act of packaging Debian licenses
On 31-Aug-01, 16:22 (CDT), Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's consider the following proposal:
The GPL file in base-files should better be renamed to GPL-2 and
GPL should be a symlink pointing to it.
[ The proposal is independent of whatever step may come afterwards if/once
Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 31-Aug-01, 16:22 (CDT), Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's consider the following proposal:
The GPL file in base-files should better be renamed to GPL-2 and
GPL should be a symlink pointing to it.
[ The proposal is
Sorry for replying to this, I am not a DD, technically just a user.
I am not a lawyer either, so sorry for discussing licensing topics.
This e-mail is about freedom, not law.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:43:27PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
...
packages under `GPL or later' should refer to the
4 matches
Mail list logo
