Re: Bug#123074: adding gfdl(7) and gpl(7)

2001-12-09 Thread Santiago Vila
reassign 123074 debian-policy thanks On Sun, 9 Dec 2001, Matthias Klose wrote: Package: base-files Currently the GFDL cannot be found in common-licenses. Not sure where to get this license ... Add it? Attached are the GPL and the GFDL in nroff -man format (from the gcc HEAD sources). gcc

Processed: Re: Bug#123074: adding gfdl(7) and gpl(7)

2001-12-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 123074 debian-policy Bug#123074: adding gfdl(7) and gpl(7) Bug reassigned from package `base-files' to `debian-policy'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts?

2001-12-09 Thread John R. Daily
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 07:58:26PM +0100, Massimo Dal Zotto wrote: In my opinion now that we have debconf we should mandate its use by policy. No. We. Should. Not. We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free-software community. We will place their interests first in our

Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts?

2001-12-09 Thread Anthony Towns
And Yay! Woo! I get to do this stupid rant, yet again. On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 11:28:51PM -0500, John R. Daily wrote: We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free-software community. We will place their interests first in our priorities. We will support the needs of our users for

Re: Should debian policy require to use debconf for postinst scripts?

2001-12-09 Thread Adam Heath
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, John R. Daily wrote: Possible reasons for mandating policy: insuring interoperability, consistency, functionality, and desire to be a fascist jerk. 1) insuring interoperability If a package doesn't work with the interface another package provides, it's still a bug.

Bug#122931: debian-policy: Spelling consistency depend(e|a)ncies in policy 2.3.8.1

2001-12-09 Thread John R. Daily
As largely irrelevant data points, my 1955 edition of the Oxford Universal, the 2nd edition of the Random House unabridged, Webster's 3rd New International, and the 1952 New Century dictionaries concur that dependancy is legitimate. Webster's 2nd edition New International does not recognize it.