Bug#99933: second attempt at more comprehensive unicode policy

2003-01-11 Thread David Starner
At 11:55 PM 1/9/2003 -0500, Colin Walters wrote: What do you expect GNOME programs to do? Since they fully support UTF-8, you can input any Unicode character you want. Also, a program like Evolution may receive a file in mail whose name uses Unicode characters. And a lot of locale charsets

Bug#176300: Please use a better From: line for CVS messages.

2003-01-11 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: debian-policy This is not a policy proposal, but a request for those of you who manage the CVS server. Please change it so that it does not send messages like this: From: debian-policy@lists.debian.org To: debian-policy@lists.debian.org Those mails trigger two common spamassassin

Bug#176300: Please use a better From: line for CVS messages.

2003-01-11 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 08:51:39PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: Of course, these checks alone do not make a message to be marked as spam, but we should avoid the risk anyway, since it's easy to do so. But what do you want to use? I don't want to use my personal address for the commits. --

Bug#176300: Please use a better From: line for CVS messages.

2003-01-11 Thread Joe Drew
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 16:41, Josip Rodin wrote: On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 08:51:39PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: Of course, these checks alone do not make a message to be marked as spam, but we should avoid the risk anyway, since it's easy to do so. But what do you want to use? I don't

Bug#99933: second attempt at more comprehensive unicode policy

2003-01-11 Thread Jakob Bohm
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 01:30:09AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 03:07, Jakob Bohm wrote: I agree, this is the only way to go. Naive, simple, classic UNIX-style programming should continue to just work, Naïve, simple, classic UNIX-style programs are ASCII-only. Then

Bug#176300: Please use a better From: line for CVS messages.

2003-01-11 Thread Jakob Bohm
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 10:41:52PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 08:51:39PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: Of course, these checks alone do not make a message to be marked as spam, but we should avoid the risk anyway, since it's easy to do so. But what do you want to