On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 12:33:52PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
I propose this patch:
--- policy.sgml~2003-07-21 12:17:53.0 +0200
+++ policy.sgml 2003-07-21 12:31:13.0 +0200
@@ -779,11 +779,24 @@
/p
p
- Packages must not depend on packages
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 07:21:41AM +0100, Martin Godisch wrote:
Hence, I'm proposing a new virtual package name internet-server (or
something like that).
On my relatively recent sid system:
% apt-cache showpkg inetd-superserver
Package: inetd-superserver
Versions:
Reverse Depends:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 01:52:58PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
[...]
I propose this patch:
--- policy.sgml~2003-07-21 12:17:53.0 +0200
+++ policy.sgml 2003-07-21 12:31:13.0 +0200
@@ -779,11 +779,24 @@
/p
p
- Packages must not depend on packages
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 01:52:58PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
[...]
I propose this patch:
--- policy.sgml~2003-07-21 12:17:53.0 +0200
+++ policy.sgml 2003-07-21 12:31:13.0 +0200
@@ -779,11 +779,24 @@
/p
p
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 01:25:35PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
I second the clarifying paragraph. I object to changing to should.
We must fix the wrong priorities once and forever, and keep them sane
sane from release to release. If the *current* ftpmasters have not
achieved this goal yet, I
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 01:25:35PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
I second the clarifying paragraph. I object to changing to should.
We must fix the wrong priorities once and forever, and keep them sane
sane from release to release. If the *current*
Title: ai fammi sognare
ai fammi sognare, ancora un po'
leggermente ho tanta troppa voglia, non posso aspettare Succhiami così
leggermente ancora ... ancora di più ... di più
Mi sento umida
Toccami!
Mmmhh...dai fammi sognare, ancora un po' leggermente ho tanta troppa voglia, non
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 01:54:59PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
I second the clarifying paragraph. I object to changing to should.
We must fix the wrong priorities once and forever, and keep them sane
sane from release to release. If the *current* ftpmasters have not
achieved this goal
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 01:54:59PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
By unenforceable you mean that ftp.debian.org do not allow NMUs?
No, I mean that a complete consistency in the set of 10K packages is
practically impossible to achieve, let alone sustain.
On Jul 21, Martin Godisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm still waiting for the inetd packages providing inetd-superserver,
which they should do some day as Marco said, and for policy legalizing
I'm still waiting for somebody interested in rewriting update-inetd, and
I'm not holding my breath.
--
10 matches
Mail list logo
