hey I just stumbled upon your photo you look good my msn name is [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hey I just stumbled upon your photo you look good my msn name is [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Noted, thanks.
>
> Feel free to reassign/clone this bug to base-files if you like.
I've cloned it to base-files so that we can independently track inclusion
in base-files and inclusion of the wording changes in Policy. Thanks!
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.19
> clone 291460 -1
Bug#291460: Inclusion of Apache Software License versions in
/usr/share/common-licenses
Bug 291460 cloned as bug 471736.
> retitle -1 Apache 2.0 license should be i
Hi buddie
Forget about huge spendings
Don't miss the hugesaving opportunity
Get Generic Version Of All Brand Name Drugs,
they are as effective as presciption are.
yes u can cut your huge medical bills
Act Now
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dg7xnq5t_0dbr2kncr
There is no reason to opt for t
On Sun, 16 Mar 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I have gotten no further feedback on this proposal. I would like to
> > resolve this bug for the next Policy release one way or the other.
> > Could others reading the Policy list please express an opinion
Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, here's an idea for such a guideline:
>
> For each packages with this license, compute max{1,log10(popcon)}. Sum
> all those values. If the total is higher than the treshold, the license
> should go in common-licenses.
>
> "A package with this license"
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:26:37PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I'd love to see some sort of guideline for this so that we could make
> incorporation of new licenses into Policy more objective in the future.
> I do agree that either priorities or popcon installations or both should
> be taken into
I won't be able to give a thorough review/response to your message until
next week. Please do not interpret my silence as anything other than
"response still pending".
The issues involved are complex and I don't want to give a misleading
answer.
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
D
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes ("Re: Bug#71621: Policy on update-alternatives still
> needed"):
> > On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 05:25:56PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > * retain the manual configuration but simply not use it when
> > >then user's manual selectio
10 matches
Mail list logo
