Russ Allbery dixit:
I agree with others in this thread that having a UTF-8 locale without the
collation changes implied by en_US is very useful for various software
packages such as automated test suites that want reproducible results and
were originally written for the C locale.
Same for
On 03.09.2010 01:46, Russ Allbery wrote:
Samuel Thibaultsthiba...@debian.org writes:
Well, it's mostly
- some people saying it's useless,
- while other people saying I need it,
and also
- en_US.UTF-8 is just fine vs.
- en_US.UTF-8 sucks, we really need C.UTF-8 instead
without any
Thorsten Glaser, le Fri 03 Sep 2010 13:02:31 +, a écrit :
Russ Allbery dixit:
I agree with others in this thread that having a UTF-8 locale without the
collation changes implied by en_US is very useful for various software
packages such as automated test suites that want reproducible
Giacomo A. Catenazzi, le Fri 03 Sep 2010 15:26:47 +0200, a écrit :
BTW I think we should wait some more time. Last week I was on
debian-glibc list a bug: printf fails if it find an invalid UTF-8
character (when the locale uses UTF-8). Note it is allowed in POSIX,
which distinguish raw strings
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 01:37:24AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Russ Allbery, le Thu 02 Sep 2010 16:24:56 -0700, a écrit :
Generally what that means is that someone needs to digest the discussion
in the thread
Well, it's mostly
- some people saying it's useless,
- while other people
Samuel Thibault dixit:
believe that's something that shouldn't break Squeeze at all.
I also believe it cannot possibly do that.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
“It is inappropriate to require that a time represented as
seconds since the Epoch precisely represent the number of
seconds between the
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 04:20:27PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Roger Leigh, le Fri 03 Sep 2010 14:52:39 +0100, a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 01:37:24AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
without any convergence.
I think reading back through the entire log,
Thanks for having done it!
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes:
Would a less confusing way to make this distinction be to say something
like: “The minimal Debian installation must have a locale available that
uses the UTF-8 character encoding.”?
The other angle here is that it can't just be any UTF-8 locale,
Aurelien Jarno, le Fri 03 Sep 2010 19:16:40 +0200, a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 04:20:27PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Roger Leigh, le Fri 03 Sep 2010 14:52:39 +0100, a écrit :
There were no objections to having a UTF-8 locale installed and
available by default, just to it *being*
9 matches
Mail list logo
