Re: [RFC] Skipping new-prerm failed-upgrade?

Raphael Hertzog wrote: > -maintainer_script_alternative(pkg, PRERMFILE, "pre-removal", cidir, > cidirrest, > - "upgrade", "failed-upgrade"); > +if (versioncompare(&pkg->available.version, > + &pkg->installed.version) > 0) /* Upgrade *

developers-reference_3.4.5_amd64.changes is NEW

(new) developers-reference-de_3.4.5_all.deb optional doc guidelines and information for Debian developers, in German This package contains the German translation of Debian Developer's Reference (package: developers-reference), a set of guidelines and best practices which has been established by

Processing of developers-reference_3.4.5_amd64.changes

developers-reference_3.4.5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: developers-reference_3.4.5.dsc developers-reference_3.4.5.tar.bz2 developers-reference_3.4.5_all.deb developers-reference-de_3.4.5_all.deb developers-reference-fr_3.4.5_all.deb developers-r

Re: [RFC] Skipping new-prerm failed-upgrade?

Raphael Hertzog writes: > I would thus like to discuss 2 ideas: > 1/ I'd argue that in the case of downgrade, dpkg should not try to run >the failed-upgrade fallback because there's no way the oldest version >can be aware of how to work-around a problem in a prerm script of a >newer

Re: [RFC] Skipping new-prerm failed-upgrade?

Hi, On Sat, 18 Jun 2011, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > 1/ I'd argue that in the case of downgrade, dpkg should not try to run > >the failed-upgrade fallback because there's no way the oldest version > >can be aware of how to work-around a problem in a prerm script of