Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 06:15:55PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
para
Remaining lines: if left blank here, the file
-emphasismust/emphasis include one or morelink
+emphasismust/emphasis include a link
Le Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 03:14:28PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit :
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
Are there other blocking issues with this DEP ? If not, I will mark it
accepted after two week-ends.
I have some lingering concern that the spec isn't sufficiently clear and
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
would it help if I would split the differences between the version in
the DEP website and the Policy's Git repository in patches that you
could apply as you review the text ? Or is one monolithic patch
acceptable ?
One monolithic patch is fine. I
Le Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 06:42:05AM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit :
One monolithic patch is fine. I was planning on updating to the current
state of the Subversion repository when the DEP is final since I know
there's development that's been done there that hasn't been tracked in the
Policy
tags 578421 + pending
quit
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 09:48:49PM -0800, tony mancill wrote:
+1, AOL, re-seconded...
Thanks to Niels and Bill for helping move this forward.
Seconded then. I have commited the change to the debian-policy repository.
Cheers,
--
Bill. ballo...@debian.org
Imagine a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 578421 + pending
Bug #578421 [debian-policy] virtual-packages: Retire java-compiler,
java2-compiler and java-virtual-machine
Added tag(s) pending.
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
578421:
Le Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 04:41:28PM +, Ximin Luo a écrit :
Is there somewhere else you guys are discussing this? Some other mailing list,
or an IRC channel?
Dear Ximin,
in practice, discussions take place where they started, that is usually
debian-project@, debian-devel@, debian-policy@
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#Le Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 01:51:07AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit
:
#
# tag 658209 informative discussion
# Unknown tag/s: informative, discussion.
user debian-pol...@packages.debian.org
Setting user to
Le Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:56:52PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
Sam Morris wrote:
C.1.2 says:
If no root-command is supplied then dpkg-buildpackage will take
no special action to gain root privilege, so that for most
packages it will have to be invoked as root to start
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
I think that it is a bit drastic. In the case of dpkg-buildpackage, I
agree that we should not repeat information found in the manual page,
but I like the short explanations on the purpose of each Dpkg helper
tool.
We've been wanting to remove those
Le Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 07:45:08PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit :
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
I think that it is a bit drastic. In the case of dpkg-buildpackage, I
agree that we should not repeat information found in the manual page,
but I like the short explanations on the
11 matches
Mail list logo
