Bug#649530: [copyright-format] clearer definitions and more consistent License: stanza specification

2012-12-26 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 01:36:32PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder a écrit : For example, I think the idea of a License-exception stanza is uncontroversial and valuable. Hi Jonathan and Ximin, given that the current specification does not forbid unpecified fields, I would recommend to test the

Bug#649530: [copyright-format] clearer definitions and more consistent License: stanza specification

2012-12-26 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi Charles, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 01:36:32PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder a écrit : For example, I think the idea of a License-exception stanza is uncontroversial and valuable. given that the current specification does not forbid unpecified fields, I would recommend to

Bug#649530: [copyright-format] clearer definitions and more consistent License: stanza specification

2012-12-26 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 11:03:20AM -0800, Jonathan Nieder a écrit : Charles Plessy wrote: Le Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 01:36:32PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder a écrit : For example, I think the idea of a License-exception stanza is uncontroversial and valuable. given that the current

Bug#649530: [copyright-format] clearer definitions and more consistent License: stanza specification

2012-12-26 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Charles Plessy wrote: If experimentations are blocked because the current specification does not allow unspecified types of paragraphs, how about considering to relax it ? I honestly think that License-Exception stanzas already are a fundamental enough change that they would have to be