Le Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 01:36:32PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
For example, I think the idea of a License-exception stanza is
uncontroversial and valuable.
Hi Jonathan and Ximin,
given that the current specification does not forbid unpecified fields,
I would recommend to test the
Hi Charles,
Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 01:36:32PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
For example, I think the idea of a License-exception stanza is
uncontroversial and valuable.
given that the current specification does not forbid unpecified fields,
I would recommend to
Le Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 11:03:20AM -0800, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 01:36:32PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
For example, I think the idea of a License-exception stanza is
uncontroversial and valuable.
given that the current
Charles Plessy wrote:
If experimentations are blocked because the current specification does not
allow unspecified types of paragraphs, how about considering to relax it ?
I honestly think that License-Exception stanzas already are a
fundamental enough change that they would have to be
4 matches
Mail list logo