Bug#844431: Revised patch: seeking seconds

Bill, > > > Now compare with reproducible build. You get some error report you > > > cannot reproduce, do some change following the help provided and > > > hope for the best. Then some day later you get the same error > > > report. > > > > I'd dearly love to know when/where this occurred if you

Bug#749826: Documenting `Multi-Arch: foreign`

Hi Sean, Thanks for picking up multiarch! On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 09:50:21PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > I spoke to Russ and we're both of the view that we should document > multiarch piecemeal. Let's begin by getting a definition of the > Multi-Arch: field into ch. 5 of policy. I'm glad you

Processed: Re: Bug#648271: [debian-policy] 11.8.3 "Packages providing a terminal emulator" says xterm passes -e option straight to exec

Processing control commands: > tag -1 -patch +pending Bug #648271 [debian-policy] 11.8.3 "Packages providing a terminal emulator" says xterm passes -e option straight to exec Removed tag(s) patch. Bug #648271 [debian-policy] 11.8.3 "Packages providing a terminal emulator" says xterm passes -e

Bug#648271: [debian-policy] 11.8.3 "Packages providing a terminal emulator" says xterm passes -e option straight to exec

control: tag -1 -patch +pending On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 02:52:11AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Support the command-line option "-e ", which creates a new > terminal window and runs the specified command. may be > multiple arguments, which form the argument list to the executed > program.

Bug#844431: Revised patch: seeking seconds

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 05:40:23PM -0700, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Bill, > > > Now compare with reproducible build. You get some error report you > > cannot reproduce, do some change following the help provided and > > hope for the best. Then some day later you get the same error > > report. > >

Bug#786470: debian-policy: [copyright-format] Add an optional “License-Grant” field

Thank you for the new patch, Ben. Comments: - please move the License-Grant field to the end of the list of fields to avoid any renumbering - please strip the rewordings that you've made to other parts of the document, so this patch addresses this bug alone. If you want to make those

Bug#630174: debian-policy: forbid installation into /lib64

control: tag -1 -patch +pending I too second the following change proposed by Bill: > diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml > index 404dc73..f9fdbf7 100644 > --- a/policy.sgml > +++ b/policy.sgml > @@ -6955,12 +6955,13 @@ Built-Using: grub2 (= 1.99-9), loadlin (= 1.6e-1) >

Processed: Re: Bug#630174: debian-policy: forbid installation into /lib64

Processing control commands: > tag -1 -patch +pending Bug #630174 [debian-policy] debian-policy: forbid installation into /lib64 Removed tag(s) patch. Bug #630174 [debian-policy] debian-policy: forbid installation into /lib64 Added tag(s) pending. -- 630174:

Processed: tagging 844431

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 844431 - pending Bug #844431 [debian-policy] debian-policy: Packages should be reproducible Removed tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 844431:

Processed: tagging 844431

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 844431 - patch + pending Bug #844431 [debian-policy] debian-policy: Packages should be reproducible Removed tag(s) patch. Bug #844431 [debian-policy] debian-policy: Packages should be reproducible Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping

Bug#749826: Documenting `Multi-Arch: foreign`

Hello Helmut, I spoke to Russ and we're both of the view that we should document multiarch piecemeal. Let's begin by getting a definition of the Multi-Arch: field into ch. 5 of policy. I have pushed a new branch to the Debian policy repo named bug749826-spwhitton. On that branch I've committed

Bug#630174: debian-policy: forbid installation into /lib64

On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 23:00:51 +0200 Bill Allombert wrote: >[...] > > OK, here a new patch. > > Seconds welcome! > > Cheers, > -- > Bill. > > Imagine a large red swirl here. Hi, I second the following change proposed by Bill: > diff --git