Hi,
Clément Hermann wrote:
> 4.9 states:
> The package build should be as verbose as reasonably possible.
> This means that ``debian/rules`` should pass to the commands it
> invokes options that cause them to produce maximally verbose
> output.
>
> "as verbose as reasonably possib
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2018 13:44:49 +0800
with message-id <87h8kdl3u6@iris.silentflame.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#904934: [debian-policy] Add footnote to find easily
the corresponding days for the urgency field
has caused the Debian Bug report #904934,
regarding [debian-policy] Add
Hello,
On Tue 31 Jul 2018 at 09:20AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Both the BTS and Salsa are workable, both communication paradigms are used
> successfully by other projects, and both have their pluses and minuses. I
> don't really care which we use, but I do care a lot that we only use one
> of
Markus Koschany writes:
> Please keep it simple. I disagree that we would need a version bump of
> copyright format 1.0 which had to be documented in every
> debian/copyright file again by changing the Format field. A simple
> amendment would also do the trick which could be referenced by the
> P
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.2.0.0
Severity: normal
Hi,
4.9 states:
The package build should be as verbose as reasonably possible.
This means that ``debian/rules`` should pass to the commands it
invokes options that cause them to produce maximally verbose
output.
"as verbose
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2018 09:43:33 +0800
Source: debian-policy
Binary: debian-policy
Architecture: source
Version: 4.2.0.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Policy Editors
Changed-By: Sean Whitton
Desc
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2018 02:43:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#876075: fixed in debian-policy 4.2.0.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #876075,
regarding Anchors are non-unique in the single-HTML version
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2018 02:43:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#886258: fixed in debian-policy 4.2.0.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #886258,
regarding Clarify whether or not the Standards-Version field must be present,
or lower Lintian tag severity
to be marked as done
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2018 02:43:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#879048: fixed in debian-policy 4.2.0.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #879048,
regarding debian-policy: footnote links pointing to wrong location
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2018 02:43:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#873456: fixed in debian-policy 4.2.0.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #873456,
regarding debian-policy: missing anchor: document-index
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2018 02:43:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#813471: fixed in debian-policy 4.2.0.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #813471,
regarding Permit some network access to the build host
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2018 02:43:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#628515: fixed in debian-policy 4.2.0.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #628515,
regarding recommending verbose build logs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2018 02:43:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#879048: fixed in debian-policy 4.2.0.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #879048,
regarding www.debian.org: Invalid footnote links in the online version of the
Debian Policy Manual v4.1.4.1
to be marked as done
Your message dated Thu, 02 Aug 2018 02:43:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#459427: fixed in debian-policy 4.2.0.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #459427,
regarding changelog vs. NEWS handling
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Hi,
Markus Koschany wrote:
> FYI: Here is what one of the ftp-masters, Jörg Jaspert, wrote in
> response to my proposal to reduce boilerplate in debian/copyright.
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883950#80
>
> I believe it shows the generally tendency that they are in favor o
debian-policy_4.2.0.0_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-policy_4.2.0.0.dsc
debian-policy_4.2.0.0.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Hello Bill,
On Fri 27 Jul 2018 at 12:31PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> I am fine with the removal of source-level changelogs, with the provisio
> that the concept of source-level changelog be clearly defined in policy.
> This needs to be worded carefully so that maintainers do not start
> remov
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> limit source debian-policy
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'debian-policy'
Limit currently set to 'source':'debian-policy'
> tags 459427 + pending
Bug #459427 [debian-policy] changelog vs. NEWS handling
Added tag(s
FYI: Here is what one of the ftp-masters, Jörg Jaspert, wrote in
response to my proposal to reduce boilerplate in debian/copyright.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883950#80
I believe it shows the generally tendency that they are in favor of the
proposal.
Regards,
Markus
si
First of all let me thank Sean for moving this issue forward.
Let me also reiterate what the whole point of this bug report is again.
The bug reporter, myself and others would like to reduce the unnecessary
amount of boilerplate in debian/copyright. The brackets are not the
important part of our p
20 matches
Mail list logo
