On 10/01/2018 07:36 AM, Fred Maranhão wrote:
> Le ven. 28 sept. 2018 à 12:42, Sean Whitton a écrit :
>> Would "debian-policy-pt-br" be the right name for a binary package
>> containing a translation of Debian Policy into Brazilian Portuguese?
>
> in my opinion, yes.
>
> it is the same pattern as
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 03:16:55PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes:
> > On Sat 27 Oct 2018 at 02:43PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >> Yup, completely agreed. I was wondering myself if we should start
> >> doing that for exactly this reason (clearing the path for non-normative
Control: tags -1 - pending
Maintainers, what do you think about
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/developers-reference/merge_requests/8/diffs to
fix this bug?
Any objections against me merging this?
BTW: I'm removing the pending tag for now, since this is not yet committed
(at least not to
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - pending
Bug #818850 [developers-reference] developers-reference: two chapters regarding
the 'default' field
Removed tag(s) pending.
--
818850: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818850
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Hello,
On Sun 28 Oct 2018 at 04:04PM GMT, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Well, more specifically debhelper.
>>
>
> FTR, I would be happy if the solution was not specific to "debhelper" in
> the long term. In particular, there is a world of difference between
> "debhelper", "cdbs with debhelper",
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 -patch +pending
Bug #188731 [debian-policy] Also strip .comment and .note sections
Removed tag(s) patch.
Bug #188731 [debian-policy] Also strip .comment and .note sections
Added tag(s) pending.
--
188731:
control: tag -1 -patch +pending
Hello,
On Sun 28 Oct 2018 at 03:51PM GMT, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> .. [#]
>> - You might also want to use the options ``--remove-section=.comment``
>> - and ``--remove-section=.note`` on both shared libraries and
>> - executables, and ``--strip-debug`` on
Sean Whitton:
> Hello Niels,
>
> On Sun 28 Oct 2018 at 02:22PM GMT, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
>> I think I agree with your suggestion of shading policy requirements that
>> are already covered by common tools.
>
> Well, more specifically debhelper.
>
FTR, I would be happy if the solution was not
Sean Whitton:
> control: tag -1 +patch
>
> Hello,
>
> On Fri 28 Sep 2018 at 05:38AM GMT, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
>> * We now have auto-generated dbgsym packages by dh_strip (which were
>>just an idea when Bill wrote that answer).
>>
>> * Policy mentions "--remove-section=.comment
Hello Niels,
On Sun 28 Oct 2018 at 02:22PM GMT, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I think I agree with your suggestion of shading policy requirements that
> are already covered by common tools.
Well, more specifically debhelper.
> At the moment, I am hesitant as to whether I should second Sean's text
>
Russ Allbery:
> Sean Whitton writes:
>
>> Thank you for following up.
>
>> Here is a minimal patch, for which I am seeking seconds. I didn't
>> include a recommendation to use dh_strip because we generally keep such
>> recommendations in footnotes rather than the text of Policy, and we are
>>
11 matches
Mail list logo
