Re: Bug#39830: debian-policy: [PROPOSED]: get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks

1999-06-23 Thread Christoph Lameter
Bug information belongs in the bug tracking system. If someone can manually set up a link then it would not be much of an additional effort to put up a manpage with some useful information. On 22 Jun 1999, Manoj Srivastava wrote:

Re: Bug#39463,#39482,#39493: timidity, cdrdao, cdtool has no manpage for something

1999-06-16 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, Roland Rosenfeld wrote: what do we gain by making a symlink to undocumented(7), The symlink is there for information to the user, that he doesn't need to provide a bug report, because this bug is already known (that's the intension of undocumented(7), as you can read

Re: Bug#39463,#39482,#39493: timidity, cdrdao, cdtool has no manpage for something

1999-06-16 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Wed, 16 Jun 1999, Roland Rosenfeld wrote: So what about simply removing the paragraph about undocumented.7 from the policy and change lintian to flame if there is only this symlink? Seconded.

Re: md5sum proposal

1999-05-26 Thread Christoph Lameter
On 25 May 1999, Manoj Srivastava wrote: I still do not see why this has anything to do with the packaging system. If all you want is to ensure that the files on your system have not been modified since the time you installed them (and, frankly, I think you really really should also

md5ums: Why tripwire etc is no solution

1999-05-26 Thread Christoph Lameter
1. There is a time between the installation of the package and the run of any tool to generate checksums. Things can happen to a file in that time period. Files can even be damaged while being installed by dpkg. One example is a broken hardware writing faulty data to the HD on

Re: md5sum proposal

1999-05-24 Thread Christoph Lameter
: On Sun, May 23, 1999 at 02:55:58PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: Seconded On Mon, 17 May 1999, Piotr Roszatycki wrote: I think DEBIAN/md5sums file should be required for all packages. Just as a note: I don't object to this; I simply don't think it'll improve security in any

Re: md5sum proposal

1999-05-23 Thread Christoph Lameter
. - Christoph Lameter (MS CS, M.Div.) http://lameter.com Adjunct Professor (CS Rel) University of Phoenix -

Re: md5sum proposal

1999-05-23 Thread Christoph Lameter
Seconded On Mon, 17 May 1999, Piotr Roszatycki wrote: I think DEBIAN/md5sums file should be required for all packages. - Christoph Lameter (MS CS, M.Div.) http://lameter.com

Re: md5sum proposal

1999-05-19 Thread Christoph Lameter
. - Christoph Lameter, MSCS, M.Div. -

Re: md5sum proposal

1999-05-18 Thread Christoph Lameter
don't have the wasted space. - Christoph Lameter, MSCS, M.Div. Available for a job or consulting (see http://lameter.com/consulting.html) -

Re: md5sums

1998-12-02 Thread Christoph Lameter
debsums is used for md5sums generated *before* generating the .deb. They will detect any tampering attempts or any other accidents in the whole packaging in and out process. Its an attempt to guarantee that the files are the way they were on the *maintainers* system. tripwire adds md6sums *after*

Re: Apology to the authors of helper packages

1998-03-14 Thread Christoph Lameter
helper scripts for : my outburst; I regretted it as soon as I had sent it. : Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: :Maybe we should also try to have developers who are up to date on the :tools and who use modern software. : This was an attack. Perhaps you overreaccted a bit

Re: Clarification of Policy and Packaging manuals requested

1998-02-24 Thread Christoph Lameter
: Zed After having lurked in debian-devel for a while, I suspect that : Zed Manoj will object that developers for Debian need to be sufficiently : Zed proficient in writing shell scripts and whatever else that they can : Zed deal with this on their own. : ;-) : Zed I think that mindset is

Re: Changelog files

1997-11-29 Thread Christoph Lameter
: : Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : As you know well by now Juan: debstd compresses changelogs. So : please state the issue accurately. : Umm, not always it doesn't. If you're going to ask people to be : accurate, please do the same yourself. If the changelog is small it : won't

Re: Changelog files

1997-11-19 Thread Christoph Lameter
As you know well by now Juan: debstd compresses changelogs. So please state the issue accurately. In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: : On Wed, 19 Nov 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : A quick scan on Contents.gz showed that 552 packages come with :uncompressed changelogs. : So

Re: Backspace and delete

1997-11-13 Thread Christoph Lameter
I am sure that emacs can program the keyboard to its liking. There is no need to impose a standard on the rest of the world just because of emacs. But I am not sure that Ian meant to proscribe Backspace - DEL. Seems to me that he wants an app to respect the stty erase setting. I think that is a

FHS simulation through Symlinks in hamm?

1997-11-04 Thread Christoph Lameter
/man - ../share/man ... so that old packages can still be installed. On Mon, 3 Nov 1997, Christian Schwarz wrote: On Mon, 3 Nov 1997, Christoph Lameter wrote: What are talking about here is basically no problem to fix with a few symlinks in the base-files package. This is trivial

Statements of intend to start work on a package

1997-10-28 Thread Christoph Lameter
I actually would like to have multiple packages offering the same functionality in debian and I have released for example multiple webservers and multiple MTAs with overlapping features. I think the requirement for this discussion originated from a time when the Debian project was quite small.

Re: Policy Weekly Issue #4/4: Announcing new packages before uploading them

1997-10-28 Thread Christoph Lameter
Very good idea. Maybe that should be the ONLY way bug reports could be closed? That way we have an insurance that bug reports are only closed by the maintainer. In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: : Andreas Jellinghaus writes: : Topic 4: Announcing new packages before uploading them : :

Re: When to get the upstream maintainer involved.

1997-10-20 Thread Christoph Lameter
I think the Debian Project gets more and more overregulated. Maybe we should have some suggestions in the manual but the relationship between a package maintainer and the upstream author is generally dependant on the specific situation varying between dont bother me to why did you not tell me!!.

Re: Why no listing in packages for ssh, apache-ssl, etc. (And no US sites?)

1997-10-14 Thread Christoph Lameter
Go ahead and do it! I'd really like to have another site in the US carrying it. Canwe modify dpkg-ftp to be able to access multiple sites? I.e. we have another field for the crypto site. : My logs show that the treasury dept has been to my webpage several times; the : webpage that states that I