Re: Original sources, or not

2003-10-23 Thread Glenn McGrath
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 08:01:46 +0200 Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, many packages seem to contain .orig.tar.gz files which may or may not be directly related to the files actually available from upstream. That is unfortunate. I think that it would make sense to add a

Re: [devel-ref] author/homepage in description

2002-12-16 Thread Glenn McGrath
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:12:08 +0100 Wichert Akkerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Previously Adam DiCarlo wrote: Well, before I venture on this, is there a way we can store certain data in control.tar.gz or something but without bloating the Packages file? No. Well, not with existing

version number or version string ?

2002-10-29 Thread Glenn McGrath
Debian policy mentions a version number in a number of places. I think it is misleading to call it a number, a version string would be more precise. Calling it a version number may give people the false impression that a '.' is a decimal point rather than a seperator. Also its a stretch to call

Bug#48045: normal and non-US names

2001-09-20 Thread Glenn McGrath
The 'normal' component by itself should be called 'crippled'. 'Crippled': A damaged or defective object or device. The 'non-US' component should be called 'enhance' (or something else). 'Enhance': To make greater, as in value, beauty, or effectiveness; augment. When both 'crippled' and

Bug#48045: normal and non-US names

2001-09-20 Thread Glenn McGrath
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001 03:35:33 +1000 Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au wrote: On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 02:28:47AM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote: The 'normal' component by itself should be called 'crippled'. 'Crippled': A damaged or defective object or device. Software in main that is damaged

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allowing crypto in the main archive

2001-01-22 Thread Glenn McGrath
Remco Blaakmeer wrote: On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, Jakob Bøhm wrote: Placing crypto software in any part of the main archive still has a very important legal problem: snip Sorry, to be putting down a nice idea, but I would hate to see the project getting in trouble from checking only US