At 8:49 am, Thursday, September 4 2003, Andrew Suffield mumbled:
Not quite; it should be modified to explicitly exclude
debhelper. There are very few packages which are actually needed at
clean time - the warning is correct for most things.
Noted. The check in question now doesn't moan if
At 8:49 pm, Saturday, July 19 2003, Matt Kraai mumbled:
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.6.0
[The Perl policy version is 1.20.]
The Perl policy recommends the use of ${perl:Depends}. It should
also state that dependencies caused by versioned uses and on
separately packaged modules are
At 8:49 pm, Monday, June 2 2003, Josip Rodin mumbled:
I don't know exactly why it's done that way (it was introduced long before
I ever became a Debian developer), but it's the scheme we use and we're
keeping it, for consistency and backwards compatibility (we have almost
500 Perl modules
At 2:20 am, Sunday, February 9 2003, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis mumbled:
I simply wuold like to know your opinion about the subject.
IMHO this would be a nice idea: it would give uploaders more visibility, hence
more satisfaction (afterall they are maintainers too).
I thought that if we
At 10:14 am, Tuesday, December 10 2002, Joey Hess mumbled:
As discussed earlier on this list, and now implemented by lots of stuff
in Debian[2] and with only a few to go[3], I'm proposing that the
following be added to policy around section 12.4:
Web browsers
Some
At 1:39 am, Tuesday, October 29 2002, Bennett Todd mumbled:
There's a component whose license terms have developed an oddity;
I'd like to discuss this with the folks in Debian who handle license
issues --- i.e., does something make it into the main distrib or
does it get shunted off into
At 10:59 pm, Monday, August 19 2002, Colin Walters mumbled:
I kind of suspected so, but not having access to authoritative data I
didn't want to try to change two things at once. Well, here's an
updated patch which combines both then. I also removed some old cruft
about a.out and -N.
Any
At 9:03 pm, Sunday, June 16 2002, Robert Bihlmeyer mumbled:
$ ash -c type test
test is a shell builtin
ash and bash are AFAIK the only shells in /bin.
And you are incorrect.
zsh is in /usr/bin, and has in fact also been in /bin since 4.0.4-24. sash,
the statically linked shell in in /bin,
At 11:26 pm, Wednesday, May 1 2002, Julian Gilbey mumbled:
That sounds like a fabulous idea. What I would *really* like to see
happen (and help with), post-woody, is something like the annotated C
reference manual, which has the standard clearly identified, but lots
of extra bits of
At 10:35 pm, Thursday, March 7 2002, Daniel Quinlan mumbled:
Chris Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I suppose this proposal needs a second
Seconded. Can I do that? ;-)
I doubt it. Therefore, I second this proposal.
--
Steve
We are
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 01:12:43PM -0500, Adam Heath uttered:
Sorry for the large cc, but it is about time that debian had a unified policy
on these package names.
Right.
On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Ben Burton wrote:
Okay. Note that java policy states that Libraries packages must be named
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 10:38:49PM -0300, Cesar Eduardo Barros uttered:
There are a number of binaries which should go into /bin instead of /sbin or
/usr/sbin -- the full argument is at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200106/msg00878.html
ARGHHH!
We've been through this,
12 matches
Mail list logo
