[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason Gunthorpe) wrote on 27.08.98 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 27 Aug 1998, Jim Pick wrote:
On Aug 26, Vincent Renardias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems like everybody agrees on switching to exim, but nothing as
been
I don't think so.
Would anyone
On 27 Oct 1998, Kai Henningsen wrote:
My favorite is exim, because it is very configurable. Vmailer is
quite limited once you try to go beyond a simple configuration.
If anything that is the worst part of exim :| It's configuration format
still seems complicated to me.
It's by
On Tue, 27 October 1998 17:36:44 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
I've always found exim's configuration to be formidable. It is
configurable but not easially configurable. You do have the read the (very
long) documents detailing the mechanics for what is going on and have to
understand them
On Tue, Oct 27, 1998 at 05:36:44PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
It's by far the simplest MTA configuration I have ever worked with (and
that is old sendmail (sendmail.cf, no M4), smail, and exim.
I've always found exim's configuration to be formidable. It is
configurable but not
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jason Gunthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After that it is not terribly bad.. But definately not something I would
wish on someone who does not understand mail.
Uhm - someone who doesn't understand mail shouldn't fiddle around with
_any_ MTA. Far to dangerous. So I
On Wed, 26 August 1998 22:16:47 +, Joseph Carter wrote:
It was generally agreed to start moving to exim, but it was decided then
that we should wait and see what vmailer has to offer. I'm still using the
hamm exim because last I tried the slink version it was a big mess.
I'd be interested
On Thu, Aug 27, 1998 at 06:38:07AM +0200, Alexander Koch wrote:
It was generally agreed to start moving to exim, but it was decided then
that we should wait and see what vmailer has to offer. I'm still using the
hamm exim because last I tried the slink version it was a big mess.
I'd be
On Wed, Aug 26, 1998 at 04:04:23PM +0200, Vincent Renardias wrote:
[Not sure if this ought to go in debian-policy or here]
Policy I would think. I've setting mail followups to head there.
Several times already there has been discussions about using exim as the
standard Debian mailer instead
8 matches
Mail list logo
