Hello Debian policy,
I do not like /etc/profile.d idea because I am a zsh user and every
implementation I saw so far were completly broken if your shell was not bash.
-- Either /etc/profile.d applied only to bash, but why discriminating
users of other shell (zsh,tcsh,etc...) ?
-- Either
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 09:37:37AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 03:04:39PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
wrote:
You are wrong here. Sample:
- I want to provide a package with a lot of useful bash functions/aliases
w/o
changing any program
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 11:11:06AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 09:37:37AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 03:04:39PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
wrote:
You are wrong here. Sample:
- I want to provide a
reassign 122817 debian-policy
severity 122817 wishlist
thanks
On 7 Dec 2001, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pena wrote:
Package: base-files
Version: 3.0
Severity: important
Tag: patch
First of all, I'm setting this bug as important due to the fact that, even
if it works as is some packages
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 122817 debian-policy
Bug#122817: base-files: Please provide profile.d hook in /etc/profile
Bug reassigned from package `base-files' to `debian-policy'.
severity 122817 wishlist
Bug#122817: base-files: Please provide profile.d hook in /etc
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 02:20:19PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
The profile.d thing has been suggested several times (see the archived
bugs for the base-files package) and I have always rejected it because
it is against the spirit of policy when it says:
(..)
If we followed this, no
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 03:04:39PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
You are wrong here. Sample:
- I want to provide a package with a lot of useful bash functions/aliases w/o
changing any program
Write scripts and put them in /usr/local/bin.
- I want my users to have a
7 matches
Mail list logo
