This proposal (and its current title) were a bit confusingly phrased, but
the essence is to request that the Artistic license be replaced by the
Artistic 2.0 license in common-licenses.
There's another bug (#458385) requesting inclusion of the Artistic 2.0
license that includes more discussion of
reassign 381729 debian-policy
severity 381729 wishlist
thanks
Licenses in /usr/share/common-licenses are added or removed if the
debian-policy group says they should be added or removed, as this is
definitely something I don't want to decide as base-files maintainer.
Please see Why isn't license
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 381729 debian-policy
Bug#381729: Artistic Licence considered non-free
Bug reassigned from package `base-files' to `debian-policy'.
severity 381729 wishlist
Bug#381729: Artistic Licence considered non-free
Severity set to `wishlist' from
3 matches
Mail list logo